Allegiance is worship.

The information presented is not intended to encourage terrorism or a disregard towards the law or government.

Every citizen has allegiance to their nation. It is an innate condition of being a citizen. One with this status should comprehend that having allegiance to a nation is worshiping it as a god. The term god (lowercase) refers to a sovereign. This sovereign can be a pagan deity, or it can be a king, president, prime minister, prince, governor, landlord, magistrate; basically it is one who has prerogative over the subjects under him [a ruler]. If you consider having allegiance to a nation, you are actually following the ones who administer and control that nation, for a nation can not operate in self-existence. It needs men to provide agency to the administrative offices. Trusting in man [regardless of their condition] will always lead to destruction, but the men who have and are occupying these offices are of an esoteric sect. They are not common everyday people. They are ultimately satanic because they do not adhere to the message of Christ. They believe in their own idea of man’s self enlightenment. They are “humanitarians” and they proudly wear that title.

A citizen’s allegiance is duty to their government. This duty is to follow all the laws and codes [none of them being moral, but civil], and to be summoned on command. Duty is obedience/submission to superiors, and submission is to deliver yourself to the power of another. This submission is considered worship. To worship God or any other pagan god is to be obedient and to fully follow it’s laws, to deliver yourself to it. Worship is also defined as civil deference, and deference is submission. Being a citizen is submission to artifice [man’s law, legal fictions], and having your liberty being completely dominated [free-dom].

It doesn’t matter what YOU believe. If you are a citizen you are worshipping your nation. You are a gentile, a sinner, a transgressor, a worldling, a left-hand path taker, and maybe even a mammonist. You have denied following God’s Law through the example of Christ, and through temptations of civil luxury have chosen to follow man and his system of things [world of nations, legal world].

humanitarian – n. 1. One who affirms the humanity (but denies the divinity) of Christ. 2. One who professes the ‘Religion of Humanity’ holding that man’s duty is chiefly or wholly comprised in the advancement of the welfare of the human race: applied to varies schools of thought and practice.

adj. 1. Holding the views or doctrines of humanitarians; held or practiced by humanitarians. 2. Devoted to humanity or the human race as an object of worship.“— Random House Webster’s College Dictionary 1992

“Alle’giance. n.s. [ allegeance, Fr.] 1. The duty of subjects to the government.”

“Du’ty. n.s. [from due.] 3. Obedience or submission due to parents, governors, or superiours; loyalty; piety to parents.”

“Obe’dience. n.s. [ obedience, Fr. obedientia, Latin.] 1. Obsequiousness; submission to authority; compliance with command or prohibition.

“Submi’ssion. n.s. [ soumission, Fr. from submissus, Latin.] 1. Delivery of himself to the power of another.

Wo’rship. n.s. [weorðscype, Saxon.] 5. Honour; respect; civil deference.”

De’ference. n.s. [deference, French.] 3. Submission.”

“Wo’rldly. adj. [from world.] 1. Secular; relating to this life, in contradistinction to the life to come2. Bent upon this world; not attentive to a future state. 3. Human; common; belonging to the world [man’s system of things, legal world; not the Kingdom of God].”  Johnson, Samuel. A Dictionary of the English Language. 1755, 1773

worldling – A person whose soul is set upon gaining temporal possessions; one devoted to this world and its enjoyments.”— GNU version of the Collaborative International Dictionary of English

mammonist – One who is devoted to the acquisition of material wealth; one whose heart is set on riches above all else; a worldling. “— The Century Dictionary

“God – 3. god (B.) a ruler“— Chambers’s Twentieth Century Dictionary

“god – 3. A prince; a ruler; a magistrate or judge; an angel.”— Webster’s 1828

“gentile – One neither a Jew nor a Christian; a worshiper of false gods [pagan deities, rulers]; a heathen.”— Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary

3. In gram., expressing nationality, local extraction, or place of abode; describing or designating a person as belonging to a certain race, country, district, town, or locality by birth or otherwise: as, a gentile noun (as Greek, Arab, Englishman, etc.); a gentile adjective (as Florentine, Spanish, etc.).
4. In gram., a noun or adjective derived from the name of a country or locality, and designating its natives or people: as the words Italian, American, Athenian, are gentiles.”— 1889 Century Dictionary

Children are the greatest natural resource for secular pagan nations. ‘We are all jesuitical Catholics.’

The information presented is not intended to encourage terrorism or a disregard towards the law or government.

When one ponders what a nation’s greatest natural resource is they think along the terms of Nature’s bounty (i.e. water, minerals, timber, oil, etc.) It is openly admitted that people [mainly children] are a government’s greatest natural resource. To say that isn’t so obscure at first glance, but what does this actually mean behind the veil of fiction?

A government, and all of it’s inner workings, only exists on paper and in the imaginations of man. It cannot operate in it’s own self-existence, for it is a non-living artificial creation; it is lifeless [dead, a corpse]. It needs individuals to provide agency [breathe life] to the offices/entities in order for it to operate. A man in Reality is a product of nature, and it is he who provides his thoughts, energy, and actions, metaphorically being the source that powers the machine [the Beast System, civil life]; thus he is the State’s most dominant and necessary natural ‘re-source’. It is the civil ‘family’ unit [servants in a Roman household] that is essential to the “building clocks of society”, for they carry “the primary responsibility for the education [Common Core, low ranking, secular schooling] and socialization of children as well as instilling values of citizenship [civil life] and belonging in the society [vulgar ungodly masses, gentiles].” Therefore, it is necessary for the Beast System to indoctrinate children into adherence of this imaginative reality that is civil life. This is done through the process of education.

adj. [civilis, Latin.]
6. Not natural; as, a person banished or outlawed is said to suffer civil, though not natural death.
12. Relating to the ancient consular or imperial government; as, civil law.”— Samuel Johnson’s 1755 Dictionary

“CIVIL, a.
1. Pertaining to the state in general; pertaining to organized society as represented by government.
2. Specifically, relating to the commonwealth as secularly organized for purposes of peace [uninterrupted commerce]
3. Reduced to order, rule, and government; not in a condition of anarchy; controlled by a regular administration; exhibiting some refinement of customs and manners; not savage or wild; civilized: as, civil life; civil society.”

“SECULAR, a. and n.
4. Of or pertaining to the things of time or of this world, and dissociated from or having no concern with religious, spiritual, or sacred matters or uses; connected with or relating to the world or its affairs; concerned with mundane or temporal matters; temporal; worldly; profane: as. secular affairs; the secular press; secular educationsecular music.
Synonyms Temporal, etc. see worldly.
noun l. A layman.”— Century Dictionary 1889

[‘civil’ is synonymous with ‘secular’]

Family obviously derives from the Latin word familia but the meaning of this word is not what one might expect. In Latin a famulus was a ‘domestic servant’; familia was a collective noun that denoted ‘all the servants in a Roman household’. When the word was borrowed into Middle English as familie around the turn of the fifteenth century, it was with this original meaning. This sense persisted until the nineteenth century and was variously extended to include the retinue of a nobleman or the staff of a high-ranking military officer.”— Dictionary Of Word Origins, Linda and Roger Flavell

You put your kids into school where they sit in a class using pencils while being educated in government regulated common-core curriculums so they can become smart and possibly attend a prestigious university to obtain a degree, becoming a scholar, in hopes of landing a well paying job. “Control language and you control the masses!” It is no coincidence that the words we commonly use have underlying nefarious meanings.

Civil ‘education’ is etymologically akin to the act of taming wild animals and training for work. It is the breaking of the Nature of man to introduce civility with the intended result not of a moral man, but of a good citizen. As man’s maxim of law states, “A man may obey the law and yet be neither honest nor a good neighbor.” The elites define a natural man as an idiot/fool because he is not lettered or accustomed to civility. Idiot originally meant private as in separate and foreign from the public civil. The natural man is of nature [man], not yet domesticated into man’s system of things [per-son, hu-man]. Man’s system of things, although belonging to man, is a stranger to the natural man, therefore he must be trained, broken [like “breaking a horse”], into society. This is mostly achieved through registering [a deliverance to a sovereign’s ownership] a child into the guardianship of public schooling where the goal is “enforcement of the minimum standards of education thought necessary for an informed and useful citizenry. In sheer economic terms, the nation’s children are a natural resource, which the state may legitimately exploit to its full potential by means of compulsory education.” Through civil education your child becomes the State’s greatest natural resource.

“education (n.)
1530s, “child-rearing,” also “the training of animals,” from French education (14c.) and directly from Latin educationem (nominative educatio) “a rearing, training,” noun of action from past-participle stem of educare (see educate). Originally of instruction in social codes and manners; meaning “systematic schooling and training for work” is from 1610s.
All education is despotism. [William Godwin, “Enquirer,” 1797]”—

“Recognizing that children are the Commonwealth’s greatest natural resource…”— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 194A.010

“Thus from its inception this country has placed its faith in public education as a means of insuring the development, improvement and preservation of the social fabric. In Brown v. Board of Education the Supreme Court, in holding that separate facilities for the races are inherently unequal, recognized this deep commitment to public education:

‘Today, education is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments. Compulsory school attendance laws and the great expenditures for education both demonstrate our recognition of the importance of education to our democratic society. It is required in the performance of our most basic public responsibilities, even service in the armed forces. It is the very foundation of good citizenship. Today it is a principal instrument in awakening the child to cultural values, in preparing him for later professional training, and in helping him to adjust normally to his environment. In these days, it is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life if he is denied the opportunity of an education. Such an opportunity, where the state has undertaken to provide it, is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms.’

Clearly the state has a valid interest in compulsory education: the goal is not the standardization of the nation’s youth but enforcement of the minimum standards of education thought necessary for an informed and useful citizenry. In sheer economic terms, the nation’s children are a natural resource, which the state may legitimately exploit to its full potential by means of compulsory education. But there is a countervailing, though largely undefined, policy of pluralism and deference to minority ethnic groups that supports the Amish refusal to be modern men.”— THE PAST AS PRESENT: SELECTED THOUGHTS & ESSAYS by Paul T. Ruxin, The Right Not to Be Modern Men: The Amish and Compulsory Education

resource (n.)
1610s, “any means of supplying a want or deficiency,” from French resourse “a source, a spring,” noun use of fem. past participle of Old French resourdre “to rally, raise again,” from Latin resurgere “rise again” (see resurgent).

The meaning “possibility of aid or assistance” (often with a negative) is by 1690s; the meaning “expedient, device, shift” also is from 1690s. Resources as “a country’s wealth, means of raising money and supplies” is recorded by 1779. A library resource center was so called by 1968.”—

1. Again; anew: rebuild.
2. Backward; back: react.
3. Used as an intensive: refine.“— American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 5th

“SOURCE, noun [Latin surgo.]
1. Properly, the spring or fountain [persons] from which a stream of water [commerce] proceeds, or any collection of water within the earth or upon its surface, in which a stream originates…
2. First cause; original; that which gives rise to any thing. Thus ambition, the love of power and of fame, have been the sources of half the calamities of nations. Intemperance is the source of innumerable evils to individuals.”— Webster’s 1828

We refer to our young offspring as kids, and most of us know the term kid used to mean a young goat, but it is also connected to the word ‘heathen’. There is a nefarious reason why we’ve been made to use that term for our offspring. In Matthew 25:31-46 a parable is made about Followers [sheep] and unbelievers [goats] when Christ reigns on earth. The sheep are on the right handed less travelled path and are accepted into God’s Kingdom, whereas the goats have taken the wide and heavily tracked left handed path and are inevitably lead into irredeemable separation from God. In the Jewish Day Of Atonement they would take two goats and imaginatively place sins on one (To Azazel) and ordained the other as pure and innocent (To The Lord). They both were killed/sacrificed as commanded by God [the Jews either misinterpreted God’s word, or they were actually bewitched by Satan posing as God]. The one who was “To The Lord” was sacrificed, and the other “To Azazel” was sent out into the wilderness/desert and pushed over a cliff falling to it’s death. Ancient and modern pagans sacrifice goats for their pseudo-spiritual rituals. In the Hindu sacrificial ceremony of Deopokhari, a young goat is taken and thrown into a pond where a group of men torture and rip apart it’s limbs for about 40 minutes or until the goat dies. This is to appease their goddess, “stemmed from a legend involving gods from medieval times who would drown children in the town pond.” Modern culture, controlled by the satanic saturnian elite, has made us refer to our young offspring as ‘kids’. A kid was always known as a young goat until the 1800s. When you refer to your young offspring as kids the powers that be interpret it as animals eligible for sacrifice. This is because you have delivered your children into a lifelong obligation of being administered by devils. You have casted them out into the ‘desert’, a cursed place devoid of God’s blessing; secular nations. Another word for professionals of the law, lawyers and barristers, are ‘devils.’ Even in modern times, the barristers of the U.K. proudly call themselves devils and ‘devilmasters.’ It is lawyers who cunningly draft up these ungodly laws and codes we are subjected to follow. In early American history lawyers were abhorred, and in some places they were prohibited from practicing law.

“KID, noun [Latin hoedus; vulgar.]
1. A young goat.
2. A faggot; a bundle of heath and furze.”— Webster’s 1828

Old English hæðen “not Christian or Jewish,” also as a noun, “heathen man, one of a race or nation which does not acknowledge the God of the Bible“…
Perhaps literally “dweller on the heath, one inhabiting uncultivated land;” see heath + -en…”—

Desert: (midbar, arabah)
(5.) This word is the symbol of the Jewish church when they had forsaken God (Isa 40:3). Nations destitute of the knowledge of God are called a “wilderness” (32:15, midbar). It is a symbol of temptation, solitude, and persecution (Isa 27:10, midbar; 33:9, arabah).“— Easton’s Bible Dictionary

lawyer, n. jurist; legal adviser; district or prosecuting attorney, attorney general, prosecutor; advocate, barrister, solicitor, counsel, counselor (-at-law); King’s or Queen’s counsel; attorney (-at-law); bencher; bar; pleader; Portia; a Daniel come to judgment; judge advocate; devil’s advocate; pettifogger, shyster. Colloq., D.A.; ambulance chaser; sea lawyer. Slang, mouthpiece, lip.”— The New American Roget’s College Thesaurus In Dictionary Form, 1962

“probatio diabolica [Latin “devil’s proof”] Civil law. The (usu. difficult) proof of ownership of an immovable thing by tracing its title back to the sovereign.”

deviling (dev-d-ling). 1. The act of a barrister’s handing a brief over to another to handle a case. 2. The practice of a junior barrister (known as a “devil”) who drafts pleadings or other documents for a senior barrister [devilmaster] who approves them, signs them, and is ultimately responsible for the work. – Also spelled devilling.“— Black’s Law 8th

“The [Plymouth] colony’s first trained lawyer, Thomas Lechford, did little to instill enthusiasm. He was disbarred for trying to influence a jury. Antilawyer sentiment was pervasive elsewhere as well, and the ‘ancient English prejudice against lawyers secured new strength in America.’ The framers of the Fundamental Constitutions of the Carolinas in 1669 declared it a ‘base and vile thing to plead for money or reward.’ Connecticut and Virginia during a portion of the seventeenth century prohibited lawyers from practicing.”— The Magic Mirror: Law In American History

The root word for ‘school’ is scheme which leads to a secret or devious plan, and also shape, form, appearance. It is a devious plot to shape the child with the appearance of civil personhood in it’s innate form of secular servitude to provide source for the artificial world of human control [civil society]. Anyone can see the relation with the design of civil schools being similar to that of prisons, but this is not a coincidence. Public schools were designed intentionally by the same architects who designed prisons. Architect Frank Locker from Harvard University said in an interview with the Colombian newspaper El Tiempo, “In the US, many of the same people who designed prisons also designed schools. What comes to mind when you see a long hall of closed doors, that you can’t be in without permission, and a bell that tells you when to come in, when to leave, when class starts, when it ends? What does that look like to you?” This is to subconsciously acclimate the child’s mind into the open-air debtors prison [hell] that is civil society. In law ‘hell’ is the “place under the exchequer chamber, where the king’s debtors were confined.” Our citizenship relation to our secular nation is of eternal debtorship, for in it we always owe civil obligations, and we are under the executive jurisdictional branch where we are confined. Public and private civil schooling resembles the Catholic school in it’s basic design indoctrinating dogmatic fear and obedience to authority. What is taught according to the curriculum is fact. What was once white is now black, and what was once sweet is now bitter. Case closed. We are all jesuitical Catholics now as it will be more apparent later in this article.

“SCHOOL, believe it or not, originally meant leisure, spare time, ease. It comes from the Greek skhole, which is also the root of scheme.”— Twenty-Five Curious Word Origins, The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 50, No. 6 (Feb., 1969)

“SCHOOL, noun [Latin schola; Gr. leisure, vacation from business, lucubration at leisure, a place where leisure is enjoyed, a school The adverb signifies at ease, leisurely, slowly, hardly, with labor or difficulty. I think, must have been derived from the Latin. This word seems originally to have denoted leisure, freedom from business, a time given to sports, games or exercises, and afterwards time given to literary studies. the sense of a crowd, collection or shoal, seems to be derivative.]”— Webster’s 1828

“school (n.)
… ” from Greek skhole “spare time, leisure, rest, ease; idleness; that in which leisure is employed; learned discussion;” also “a place for lectures, school;” originally “a holding back, a keeping clear,” from skhein “to get” (from PIE root *segh- “to hold“) + -ole by analogy with bole “a throw,” stole “outfit,” etc.

… Translated in Old English as larhus, literally “lore house,” but this seems to have been a glossary word only.”—

noun A secret or devious plan; a plot.”— The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition

“scheme (n.)
1550s, “figure of speech,” from Medieval Latin schema “shape, figure, form, appearance; figure of speech; posture in dancing,” from Greek skhema (genitive skhematos) “figure, appearance, the nature of a thing,” related to skhein “to get,” and ekhein “to have, hold; be in a given state or condition,” from PIE root *segh- “to hold.”

The sense “program of action” first is attested 1640s. Unfavorable overtones (selfish, devious) began to creep in early 18c.”—

“HELL. The name formerly given to a place under the exchequer chamber, where the king’s debtors were confined.”— Black’s Law 4th

It’s class time which starts with the ‘pedagogue’ taking roll-call to account how many ships are present! Pedagogue is another word for an educator teaching in a dogmatic manner, derived from Greek paidagogos which referred to a slave in charge of children. The word ‘class’ was first used by the ancient pagan romans meaning army/fleet referring to a group of ships or persons under arms. It was also an order to divide the romans for taxation. This is fitting in our modern usage of it, for the purpose of public and private school classes is to teach the child just enough to stay afloat in their taxed citizen-ships, bearing the Arms of their secular nation, when they utilize or sign for their government issued [G.I.] per-son at/after the age of legal accountability. ‘Roll-calling’ comes from the military as a signal given by a drum, trumpet, or other musical instrument for soldiers to attend the accounting of who was present. In the 14th century the word ‘roll’ referred to a register. Your child must be registered [abandoned to the king] into the public to be accepted into public school. As a verb it meant to cover, wrap, or enclose; symbolic to civil education placing veils over their eyes and ears so they cannot see nor hear Truth.

1. A schoolteacher; an educator.
2.One who instructs in a pedantic or dogmatic manner.“— The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition

“PEDAGOGUE originally meant a slave in charge of children. It comes from the Greek paidagogos and is etymologically related to agent [servant/slave].

“CLASS has its origin in classis, the Latin word for fleet. At first the Romans applied the word to a group of ships only, but gradually they extended its application to a group of people, and this meaning has come down to our times.”— Twenty-Five Curious Word Origins, The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 50, No. 6 (Feb., 1969)

“class (n.)
… from Latin classis “a class, a division; army, fleet,” especially “any one of the six orders into which Servius Tullius divided the Roman people for the purpose of taxation;” traditionally originally “the people of Rome under arms” (a sense attested in English from 1650s), and thus akin to calare “to call (to arms),” from PIE root *kele- (2) “to shout.” In early use in English also in Latin form classis.”—

One cannot have class without utilizing pencils! The powers that be have a sick sense of humor. To them a ‘pencil’ is a phallic symbol. They decided to use the ancient roman slang term for a paintbrush, which is penicillum— a diminutive form of the word for penis, referring to a lead based wooden writing utensil. This isn’t surprising when you consider the fact that the elites esoterically idolize the phallus, preferably erected ones which the obelisk symbolizes. The general design of a pencil is intentionally shaped in similar fashion to that of an obelisk. The obelisk has been placed in many municipalities worldwide, and like a dog pissing to mark his territory the elites like to erect this column to mark their satanic sovereignty being divinely ordained to administrate the ungodly masses. In writing and grammar, an ‘obelisk’ is “a mark of censure in the margin of a book, in the form of a dagger [†].” A ‘censure’ is a blame, a judgement, and “a spiritual punishment inflicted by some ecclesiastical judge.” We are being spiritually punished for putting gods before Yehovah, and the obelisk structure is a mark which represents that. The powers that be hold multiple meanings for each of their symbols. To their phallic symbol they attribute flattering, man-occulted, humanist, pagan-spiritual concepts for the appearance of sacred truth and importance, but underneath the veil is just homoerotic satanic deviance. These flattering pseudo-spiritual [catholic, new age, pagan] concepts range from signifying St. Michael and his angels, resurrection, restored order/birth of a new age, Earth’s polar shift, sun worship, male/solar energy, etc. Obelisks supposedly originated in ancient Egypt for sun worship, but the idea of it being phallic shaped specifically comes from the legend of the Osirian Cycle—

“… monolith, obelisk and stone. All of these are significant symbols in the ancient Mystery Religions. And you saw that this was not God, because creation had already taken place. The world had been created, plants and animals had been created, and primitive man existed on the earth before this monolith, this obelisk, this stone ever made its appearance. It is also known as, the stone that you saw earlier, the generative force or the penis.

Osiris [sun-god] was chopped into fourteen pieces. Isis came to put him back together again and bring him to life. She could find all the pieces except one, the phallus… It is the penis of Osiris, the generative force… it represents the Luciferian philosophy.

The Egyptian allegory tells us that the phallus of Osiris was swallowed by a fish. This is most significant and we may even infer mankind itself is the fish…But it even goes any further, for this age has been known as the age of Pisces, the fish. The significant force and the power in the age Pisces was Christianity.

the phallus being the symbol of the vital power of the Mystery School and so used in Egyptian hieroglyphics. The phallus, then, is the Lost Word which is not discovered but for which a golden replica is substituted. In the Egyptian hieroglyphics the physical body, after the death of the soul or its departure therefrom, is called the khat [or K‐H‐A‐T], and the hieroglyphic for this is a fish.

In Dealey Plaza, you will find an obelisk. In Washington D.C., you will find obelisk, known as the Washington Monument. In the courtyard of the Vatican, you will find an obelisk. Should I continue? The family in England, whose estates are called Syon House, has an obelisk on their lawns.”— William Cooper, Mystery Babylon Series, 1993

The ancient Egyptian ‘Luxor Obelisk’ in Paris wearing a giant pink condom to advertise World Aids Day

“PENCIL derives in a roundabout way from penis. The Romans humorously called a painters brush a penicillum, a diminutive form of the word for the male organ of generation, and penicillum became the Old French pincel, from which we have our modern pencil.”— Twenty-Five Curious Word Origins, The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 50, No. 6 (Feb., 1969)

“OB’ELISK, noun [Latin obeliscus; Gr. a spit.]
1. A truncated, quadrangular and slender pyramid intended as an ornament, and often charged with inscriptions or hieroglyphics. Some ancient obelisks appear to have been erected in honor of distinguished persons or their achievements. Ptolemy Philadelphus raised one of 88 cubits high in honor of Arsinee. Augustus erected one in the Campus Martius at Rome, which served to mark the hours on a horizontal dial drawn on the pavement.“— Webster’s 1828

n.s. [ obeliscus, Latin.]
2. A mark of censure in the margin of a book, in the form of a dagger [†].

n.s. [censura, Latin.]
1. Blame; reprimand; reproach.
2. Judgment; opinion.
3. Judicial sentence.
4. A spiritual punishment inflicted by some ecclesiastical judge.“— Samuel Johnson’s 1755 Dictionary

Subjecting your child to Common Core curriculums molds him into a vulgar [unlettered] commoner. Hence the name. The term ‘vulgar’ means common, low-bred, illiterate. In some passages in the Bible ‘common’ refers to the public/that which belongs to the state, or defiled, unclean, unholy; i. e., “… God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean.” The word ‘curriculum’ derives from the Latin term ‘currere’ which means to run, and those with eyes to see have called educational curriculums a ‘runaround’ which means a deception. Children are being deceived into thinking they’re getting a Real education, when they are receiving a vulgar, secular, civil, commoner/low-ranking one. One thing is for sure; this curriculum makes them ‘smart’ [suffer pains, punished]. Common Core is not a federal legislation [it’s unconstitutional], yet it is enacted individually by all 50 States. Some may think they can just put their child into a private school to avoid it, but all institutions of higher education require students to have an acceptable score on tests that require Common Core, making the private schools teach it. So why do all 50 States follow suite to establish Common Core curriculums? Because the governors of the 50 States are in conspiracy to indoctrinate this vulgar curriculum onto the children to make them useful natural resources for the papal Green NWO [Agenda 21/30, “The Great Reset”]. These governors make up the membership of the National Governor’s Association, and with the CCSSO, and ADL, they scheme up Common Core curriculums/runarounds to sell to their own States. They then return from DC to their States dressing themselves in the office of governor to accept these curriculums. This documentary exposes this scheme. The lessons that come from this constantly altered and updated curriculum are ungodly, of humanism and scientism. It’s level of education is much lower than before States required certain educational standards. As quoted earlier in this article, the reason for such low education standards is it to create a vulgarly “informed and useful citizenry.” The Natural obligation of parents are to teach their own children the things required for Life. But we have been accustomed to abandoning this Natural duty to make it a money gaining endeavor for a stranger who will teach whatever is thrown at him by his satanic civil administrators. These strangers do not teach the things of Life, but the things of civil life rendering your child as the State’s greatest natural resource.

1. Of or pertaining to the common people; suited to or practised among the multitude; plebeian: as, vulgar life; vulgar sports.
2. Common; in general use; customary; usual; ordinary.
3. Hence, national; vernacular: as, the vulgar tongue; the vulgar version of the Scriptures;…
3. Pertaining or belonging to the lower or less refined class of people: unrefined; hence, coarse; offensive to good taste; rude; boorish; low; mean; base: as, vulgar men, language, minds, or manners.
4. Rustic, low-bred.
5. noun A vulgar person; one of the common people: used only in the plural.
6. noun The vernacular tongue or common language of a country.”— Century Dictionary 1889

κοινός koinós, koy-nos’; probably from G4862; common, i.e. (literally) shared by all or several, or (ceremonially) profane:—common, defiled, unclean, unholy.“— Thayer’s Greek Lexicon

PEOPLE, noun [Latin populus]
2. The vulgar; the mass of illiterate persons.
6. A collection or community of animals.
9. The Gentiles.”— Webster’s 1828

“curriculum (n.)
a course, especially a fixed course of study at a college, university, or school,” 1824, from a Modern Latin transferred use of classical Latin curriculum “a running, course, career” (also “a fast chariot, racing car”), from currere “to run” (from PIE root *kers- “to run”). Used in English as a Latin word since 1630s at Scottish universities.”—

“CURRICULUM originally meant a race course, from Latin currere, to run, and there are still many today who believe, with good reason, that a curriculum is a run around.”— Twenty-Five Curious Word Origins, The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 50, No. 6 (Feb., 1969)

“runaround – 1. Deception, usually in the form of evasive excuses.”— The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.

“SM’ART, noun [This word is probably formed on the root of Latin amarus, bitter, that is, sharp.]
2. Severe pungent pain of mind; pungent grief; as the smart of affliction.
verb intransitive
2. To feel a pungent pain of mind; to feel sharp pain; as, to smart under sufferings.
3. To be punished; to bear penalties or the evil consequences of any thing. He that is surety for a stranger shall smart for it. Proverbs 11:15.— Webster’s 1828

After your child has proven to be vulgar enough to become a student of the “higher” learning institutions, he now has a chance at obtaining additional flattering titles to his person, which in theory can aid in his chances of being employed [used] as a ‘hireling’ [serve for wages; prostitute] in a ‘job’ [low mean lucrative busy affair, a stabbing] of higher income. If he attends a ‘prestigious university’ you, as a parent, now have bragging rights to boast to your friends and family that your parenting skills ‘converted’ your child into Catholic schemery! The term ‘prestigious’ means practicing trickery; an underhand scheme. To trick is to live by fraud, so a prestigious university prepares one to be an eligible hireling in a fraudulent world ran by fiction. University comes from the term ‘universe’ which leads to the word ‘catholic’ with it’s etymology and definition being the universe/universal. Not so coincidentally, ‘catholic’ also means not bigoted; liberal, which is the face of nearly all colleges and universities. The first universities were officially established with their charters granted by the papacy. The pope also designed it’s fundamentals and applications, many of which still applies to our modern universities and colleges, such as the ranking system of students: freshman [a new convert], sophomore [a wise fool], junior [puny, low rank, unskilled], senior [priest]. Later the Jesuits took initiative and established many universities across Europe, Asia, and the Americas in accordance with the humanist papal design. Today all universities and colleges are matrixes of Catholic higher learning [“learning against learning”] institutions. We are all jesuitical Catholics now! Putting your child into one of these can benefit him in the secular world ruled by Satan. He may be able to add “Dr.” or “Phd” to his person’s name, which is pretty flattering. Then he can land a job that adds another flattering title. Depending on his ‘degree’ [of crime], when concerning his field of study he becomes an authoritative voice even if he is wrong, for the layman is unlettered and “doesn’t has the time to research.” His college degree is of crime, for he must transgress on Nature’s Law [the message of Christ] to have the worldly membership required for admission, and this degree qualifies him as a higher raking prostitute [hireling], therefore he can have a less stressful time selling himself for the pursuit of mammon. He will walk about in pride with his flattering titles believing he is some-thing when he is no-thing. He will spend his life ‘making a living’ in a fictional world instead of just living.

n.s. [from hire.]
1. One who serves for wages.
2. A mercenary; a prostitute.
1. Serving for hire; venal; mercenary; doing what is done for money.”

n.s. [A low word now much in use, of which I cannot tell the etymology.]
1. A low mean lucrative busy affair.
2.Petty, piddling work; a piece of chance work.
3. A sudden stab with a sharp instrument.”— Samuel Johnson’s 1755 Dictionary

“PRESTIG’IOUS, adjective Practicing tricks; juggling.

TRICK, noun 
1. An artifice or stratagem for the purpose of deception; a fraudful contrivance for an evil purpose, or an underhand scheme to impose upon the world; a cheat or cheating.“— Webster’s 1828

“To Trick.
1. To live by fraud.“— Samuel Johnson’s 1755 Dictionary

“CATHOLIC, a. and n. … < L. catholicus, universal, general (neut. pl. catholica, all things together, the universe), in LL. and ML. esp. eccles., general, common
1. Universal; embracing all; wide-extending
2. Not narrow-minded, partial, or bigoted [a term used mainly by leftists, socialists, and communists (which are Jesuitical political ideologies) towards those who do not adhere to their Jesuitical fiction]; free from prejudice; liberal [a common concern is that colleges and universities are “too liberal”]; possessing a mind that appreciates all truth [humanist, secular “truths”], or a spirit that appreciates all that is good [as according to the papacy].

“UNIVERSITY, n. … < L. universita(t-)s, the whole, the universe, LL. a society, company, corporation, gild, ML. a university, < universus, all together, whole, entire, collective, general: see universe.]
1. The whole, the universe.
2. A corporation; a gild.
3. An association of men for the purpose of study, which confers degrees which are acknowledged as valid throughout Christendom [The Church, what the Vatican sanctions as “Christian/ity”], is endowed, and is privileged by the state in order that the people may receive intellectual guidance, and that the theoretical problems which present themselves in the development of civilization may be resolved [through Catholic, Jesuit, liberal, humanist learning].”— Century Dictionary 1889

“freshman (n.)
1550s, “newcomer, novice,” from fresh (adj.1) in the sense “making one’s first acquaintance, inexperienced” + man (n.)…”

“newcomer (n.)
“recent arrival, a stranger newly arrived,”… Old English also used niwcumen as a noun meaning “newcomer, neophyte.”

“neophyte (n.)
c. 1400, neophite, “new convert” (modern spelling from 16c.), from Church Latin neophytus, from Greek neophytos “a new convert; one newly initiated,” noun use of adjective meaning “newly initiated, newly converted,”…”

novice (n.)
mid-14c., “probationer in a religious order,”… noun use of Latin novicius “newly imported, newly arrived, inexperienced” (of slaves)…”—

“SOPHOMORE or “wise fool” is an invented word which is supposed to be a combination of two Greek words, sophos, wise, and moros, foolish. It was probably invented in imitation of sophister, the designation given to a student in his second or third year at Trinity College, Dublin, or Cambridge University.”— Twenty-Five Curious Word Origins, The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 50, No. 6 (Feb., 1969)

“puny (adj.)
1570s, “inferior in rank” (1540s as a noun, “junior pupil, freshman“)”—

“Puisne (… from late Latin post-, “after”, and natus, “born”) is a legal term of art obsolete in many jurisdictions and, when current, used mainly in British English meaning “inferior in rank”

“SENIOR, adjective see’nyor. [Latin seniorcomparative of senex, old.] Elder or older; but as an adjective, it usually signifies older in office; as the senior pastor of a church,..”— Webster’s 1828

“Priest. —This word (etymologically “elder”, from Greek: presbuteros, presbyter) has taken the meaning of “sacerdos”, from which no substantive has been formed in various modern languages (English, French, German)…”—

We are all Catholics now!“— Mike Huckabee CPAC Speech, 2/10/2012

We are all Jesuits.” ―Herman A. Van Rompuy: President of the European Union, addressing European leaders, in Florence, Italy: Sep. 7, 2012

“The term “degree” denotes a division or classification of one specific crime into several grades or stadia of guilt, according to the circumstances attending its commission. Thus, in some states, there may be “murder in the second degree.”— Black’s Law 4th

One can scoff at the information presented here as writings from a crazy rambling conspiracist. The rulers of this world do not care what you believe as long as you are reliant on their social control systems. As long as you are using their property [i.e. your G.I. legal entity per-son, surname, citizenship, public] you become their prerogative and they have complete control over you. Those who have the eyes can see the absolute wickedness of the system converting man into hu-man [belonging to man, not God] through civil education. Taking the kid away from God’s Kingdom [the Natural] and casting him out to the desert [secular nations] to be spiritually killed is a necessity to the Beast System, for that which belongs to God is to be rendered unto Him, and that which belongs to Caesar is his prerogative [Mar 12:17]. They must turn us into hu-mans, into their property [their per-sons], so we can become their greatest natural resource.

The Romans 13 ordeal

The information presented is not intended to encourage terrorism or a disregard towards the law or government.

Some Christians use Romans 13 as a reason to participate and gain from Satan’s world [man’s legal world, worldly nations] through membership. It is that membership, aroused by the law, which tempts us towards sinful passions [artifice/mammon/respecting flattering titles, that which is not of sound doctrine] that bears the fruits for death— this is not The Way, for we are to be dead in the eyes of the law so that we can follow wholly to the example of Christ [Rom 7:4-6, Gal 2:15-21]. People will subscribe to the idea that those passages about being dead to the law only refers to the Mosaic Law, thus modern civil systems do not adhere to that, so it is okay to trespass into that which does not belong to you [civil systems], be surety for a stranger in a condition of debtorship placing man’s law above God’s and take on a legal flattering title to pursue mammon [money, or trust in an ungodly thing; trust in secular paperwork]. A civil system is godless. The term civil means a government secularly organized for uninterrupted commerce [“peace”], and it is synonymous with the word secular. It’s not just the Mosaic Law we are to be dead to, but any system of laws that breaks the great commandment from Christ [Mat 22:37]. One cannot say he loves the Father with all his heart, soul, and mind when he voluntarily becomes a member of a nation that places man’s law above God’s. Besides, the U.S. system of law is admittedly influenced by the Mosaic Law. We should not walk as the gentiles do [Eph 4:17-20] and have membership in this world. Not only did Christ deny it [Mat 4:1-11], he openly exposed it’s evils [Jhn 7:7]. In those Matthew verses Satan offered Jesus “all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them”, and in this sense “glory” means “their resources, wealth, the magnificence and greatness of their cities, their fertile lands [to sustain civil life], their thronging population.” He did not offer the things of God, but offered from man’s system of things [secular kingdoms/nations and their glory] that operates in opposition to God’s law. The Old English language recognized this with the term “baly” which meant “evil; sorrow” and also “dominion; government.”

The 23 marble relief portraits over the gallery doors of the House Chamber depict historical figures [Jesus Christ not being recognized] noted for their work in establishing the principles that underlie American law. Among them are Greek, Roman, French and English jurists; statesmen and rulers from Europe and Eurasia; and American political leaders George Mason and Thomas Jefferson. The 11 profiles in the eastern half of the chamber face left and the 11 in the western half face right, so that all look towards the full-face relief of Moses in the center of the north wall.“—

10. Separation or alienation of the soul from God; a being under the dominion of sin, and destitute of grace or divine life; called spiritual death.

‘We know that we have passed from death [dominion of sin; spiritual death, civil life] to life [civil death, spiritual life], because we love the brethren.’ 1 John 3:1. Luke I.

Civil death is the separation of a man from civil society, or from the enjoyment of civil rights; as by banishment, abjuration of the realm, entering into a monastery, etc.” — Webster’s 1828 Dictionary

(1) Evil; sorrow.
(4) Dominion; government.” — A Dictionary of Archaic and Provincial Words: Obsolete Phrases, Proverbs, and Ancient Customs, from the XIV Century, 1904

The most simple way to discount this notion of being part of Satan’s world is to contemplate on the words that are being used in Romans 13 and similar verses [Tit 3:1, 1 Pe 2:13]. “To be subject to/unto” is not the same as “to be a subject of.” We are to respect the ordinances of these gentile nations [not over and above God’s law], for their artificial existence is the will of God, but they do not force membership. We are to be subject to, not voluntary subjects of. Romans 13:9 recalls one of the ten commandments to not commit adultery. This adultery is to “have unlawful intercourse with another’s wife.” This commandment is not only the physical intercourse with another man’s wife but legal intercourse with a gentile nation [Jas 4:4]. “Intercourse” in legalese means, “Dealings or communications, especially between businesses, governmental entities, or the like.” It is okay for a true follower of Christ to communicate with governmental entities, but it is unlawful [to God] to communicate or deal for the outcome of becoming a member and gaining in the flesh from it. Also consider that gentile nations in The Bible are referred to as feminine terms like “her” [Jer 51:45, Rev 18:4], and you can see these nations as being wives of Satan. We are to have a spiritual intercourse with God/Christ [Isa 54:5, 2Co 11:2] in our citizenship in heaven [Phl 3:20], not a spiritually dead legal intercourse with Satan/nations in a secular/public/civil citizenship.

Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.” – KJV, Jas 4:4

“intercourse. 1. Dealings or communications, esp. between businesses, governmental entities, or the like.” — Black’s Law 9th

We are to be followers of Christ who was not ‘a subject of’ any nation. He was not of this world [Jhn 18:36], but He and His disciples were subject to them. Jesus communicated with Pontuis Pilate when the pharisees demanded him to use his political power to commit capitol punishment against Jesus, but when Jesus spoke the Truth unto Pilate he responded to the jews, “I find in him no fault at all.” This is because Jesus never voluntarily registered and did not break any of Rome’s laws. Jesus respected man’s dominion, never trespassed, and never rebelled against the legal authorities.

Tit 3:1, 1 Pe 2:13-20 say the same as Romans 13 but are written a little differently. Take notice that in 1 Pe 2:15-16 it says that we “may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men: As free, and not using your liberty for a cloke of maliciousness, but as the servants of God.” The term “free” here means to have no obligations like the civil obligations that citizens carry to their gentile nation. We are not to walk as the gentiles do [Eph 4:17-20] and participate in that world for private gain, for doing so is not only serving mammon [Mat 6:24], but having obligations of putting man’s law above God’s. Citizenship oaths require renouncing ALL former sovereigns, and followers of Christ do not take oaths [Mat 5:34-37]. We are not to use this liberty to break their laws.

“obligation. 2. A formal, binding agreement or acknowledgment of a liability to pay a certain amount [taxes] or to do a certain thing for a particular person or set of persons [municipalities, governmental agencies]; esp., a duty arising by contract. Also termed (in sense 2) civil obligation.” Black’s Law 9th

n.s. [gentilis, Latin.]
1. One of an uncovenanted nation; one who knows not the true God.”— A Dictionary of the English Language, by Samuel Johnson. 1755

3. In gram., expressing nationality, local extraction, or place of abode; describing or designating a person as belonging to a certain race, country, district, town, or locality by birth or otherwise: as, a gentile noun (as Greek, Arab, Englishman, etc.); a gentile adjective (as Florentine, Spanish, etc.).
4. In gram. a noun or adjective derived from the name of a country or locality, and designating its natives or people: as the words Italian, American, Athenian, are gentiles.” — 1889 Century Dictionary

Verses like Romans 13 are a command to obey your sovereign [Tit 2:9, Eph 6:5-9], but also a warning for all to not rebel against the powers that be, for there will be suffering [Rom 13:4]. Your sovereign is that who dictates the laws you have a duty to follow. Jesus Christ instructs us to renounce the world and correct the record [Tit 2:11-15]; declaring privacy to the earthly authorities that you belong to Yehovah and your prince is the Prince of Peace. If you are a Christian bonded to a gentile nation that allows renouncing your public status [most do], God is calling you to leave her [Isa 48:20]. There are no excuses to stay [Luk 14:16-24]. These nations are ordained by God to govern sinners [1 Tim 1:8-10, Pro 8:15-16] because of the free will of people wanting to break God’s laws and be ruled by man, and The Bible clearly warns of this [1 Sam 8:10-22]. “And ye shall cry out in that day because of your king which ye shall have chosen you; and the LORD will not hear you in that day.” God will not hear you in your gentile membership, for you have broken the first commandment [Exo 20:3, Deu 5:7] of putting gods before Him. The term used for “gods” in the first commandment “Thou shalt have no other gods before me.” is ‘ĕlōhîm which in this sense refers to both pagan supernatural gods and rulers/judges. We are to respect the ordinances of these gentile nations, for their artificial existence is the will of God, but they do not force membership. This civil public membership is a voluntary subjection that makes you an agent (slave) who takes on the appearance of a secular government created recognizable legal entity [your surnamed per-son; Maxim of law: “The creator controls”]. Most of us are slaves to the beast system. We can become lawfully free, therefore we must [1 Cor 7:21]. We are not be yoked (joined) with them [2 Co 6:14].

“10. Law is for Lawbreakers: “We know that the law is good if one uses it properly. We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, for the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality, for slave traders and liars and perjurers—and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine” (1 Timothy 1:8-10).

11. No Need to Change One’s Social Status [deceptive]: “Pilate then…summoned Jesus and asked him, ‘Are you the king of the Jews?’ …Jesus said, ‘My kingdom is not of this world…’ (John 18:33, 36). “Each man must remain in that condition in which he was called. Were you called while a slave? Do not worry about it; BUT IF YOU ARE ABLE ALSO TO BECOME FREE, RATHER DO THAT. For he who was called in the Lord while a slave, is the Lord’s freedman; likewise he who was called while free, is Christ’s slave… Brethren, each one is to remain with God in that condition in which he was called” (1 Corinthians 7:20-22, 24). “Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ” (Ephesians 6:5).” — University Of Wisconsin-Madison, Legal Studies Program, Sources Of Law 1: The Bible [Quoting from NIV]

“What the Seal of the United States of America represents, to anyone who takes it seriously, is a Ministry of Sin. A speech by Jesuit political scientist Michael Novak, published in the January 28, 1989 issue of America, the weekly magazine of American Jesuits, sums it up eloquently enough:
The framers wanted to build a “novus ordo” that would secure “liberty and justice for all”…. The underlying principle of this new order is the fact of human sin. To build a republic designed for sinners, then, is the indispensable task…. There is no use building a social system for saints. There are too few of them. And those there are are impossible to live with!… Any effective social system must therefore be designed for the only moral majority there is: sinners.‘” Rulers of Evil: Useful Knowledge About Governing Bodies

Because man’s law recognizes Natural Law as the foundational Law they cannot force membership in it. One must volunteer to be part of it. Legal maxim: “Equity will not support a volunteer.” There is no real fairness in Satan’s world; you can find all kinds of ridiculous laws and court cases where the judge’s ruling is completely unfair. Man’s law expects from you complete adherence to it, over and above God’s law. It is even in your name. Your surname [last name, aka nickname] is legally considered over and above your first name [given name, Christian name], and it is a mark [a trade-mark of commerce] signifying that you are a member in Satan’s world.

No one wants to hear this, but we are not to be subjects of this world and be deeply involved in it’s civil pursuits [2 Ti 2:3-7] despite all the luxuries it offers. This world is the world of the dead. Your per-son that is legally recognized is a non-living artificial entity created by the state. Yehovah is the God of the living, not the dead, and when one understands this he realizes the world is not worthy of him. With proper knowledge [Hos 4:6, Luk 11:52] and the righteousness [right standing; status] exceeding the righteousness of the scribes [Mat 5:20] you can truly begin your journey on the right hand path to the Kingdom of God here and now by going through a resurrection from civil death unto spiritual life. Nations do recognize moral men without public status, and some [i.e. USA] have obligations to serve them. Doing this does not lead to a life free of hardships, but it does give you real liberty under God if you are following Christ/the laws of nature. Christ and his followers have been persecuted for it even to this day, so expect the same to you if you were to truly follow Him [Mat 5:10-12].

The patriot denounces Christ and loves his enrollment in Satan’s world. Joseph and Mary were not registered.

The information presented is not intended to encourage terrorism or a disregard towards the law or government.

“American Patriotic Skull” metaphorically showing the spiritual and secular condition of patriots

Many people proudly claim to be patriots of their country, believing in it’s founding principles and supporting it’s welfare. They will be disheartened if they find out the real meaning behind being a patriot. According to the actual definition of ‘patriot’, part of being one is supporting the country’s current interest, but many so-called patriots do not and want to bring it back to a time when they think it was better. In reality of the legal fiction, if one does not support the nation’s current interests they are deemed to be an enemy of the state.

Patriots have love for their nation despite the fact that their relationship to it is serfdom and debtorship. Humorously in America many patriotic republicans have been swayed by the political rhetoric of Donald Trump, believing he’s some kind of patriotic savior, and they still have hope in him becoming president again. I suppose they are unaware that Trump is not a zealous supporter of the US Constitution. The fact is that looking up to men to govern your affairs will always lead to inevitable destruction. “Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help.”— Psalm 146:3

Patriots are under the delusion that the country is theirs and that it’s purpose is the citizen’s welfare. That is far from the truth as history has certainly proven. In the Constitution it starts out “We the People” with “People” being capitalized as a capitonym with a different meaning which does not refer to public citizens, but the ‘inhabitants’ of the States in their sovereign capacity. A US citizen is not an inhabitant of the State in which he ‘resides’. His inhabitance, or ‘domicile’, is the United States Corporation in the District of Columbia. He has mere residency in the state, but not domicile. The legal scribes intentionally make their legalese difficult to comprehend to the layman; as Thomas Jefferson said that in drafting statutes his fellow lawyers were accustomed to “making every other word a ‘said’ or ‘aforesaid,’ and saying everything over two or three times, so that nobody but we of the craft can untwist the diction, and find out what it means…” For a better explanation on how we are not the “People” I’ll direct you to an article that explains it well enough.

PEOPLE. Ordinarily, the entire body of the inhabitants of a State. In a political sense, that portion of the inhabitants who are intrusted with political power… The words “the people” must be determined by the connection. In some cases they refer to the qualified voters, in others [i.e. “We the People”] to the state in its sovereign capacity…”

INHABITANT. Implies a more fixed and permanent abode than “resident;” frequently imports many privileges and duties to which a mere resident could not lay claim or be subject.’
One domiciled: one who has his domicile or fixed residence in a place, in opposition to a mere “sojourner.” – A Dictionary Of Law by W.C. Anderson 1889

The definition of patriot is one “who loves his country, and zealously supports and defends it and its interests.” The word derives from Greek patrios which means “of one’s father”, patris “fatherland”, and pater which is “father” To be a patriot is to claim your father is the worldly government that is your nation, not God. Jesus said in the book of Matthew [Mat 23:9] that followers are not to call anything in the world your father. The translators intentionally added the term “man” or “one” in that verse as a misdirection giving the notion that it is not okay to call any man your father, but it is acceptable under God to call a secular nation your father/fatherland, for a nation is not a man. Our Father is not of this world, and we are patriots only to the Kingdom of God where our citizenship is supposed to be domiciled. If one claims not to be a patriot to his nation he is still a citizen which means he has voluntarily alienated adherence to a former foreign sovereign and is standing under his current secular sovereign that is the nation. If you were born in said country, at first your ‘father’ is God/Christ [a foreign sovereign to the nation, the Prince Of Peace] until the age of legal accountability. The naturalization oath of citizenship clearly states that you “absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince [Christ, the Prince Of Peace], potentate, state, or sovereignty

When breaking the word down [pat-riot], the government has always viewed patriots as terrorists even before the notion of the law labeling it’s citizens as possible ‘enemies of the state’. A ‘pat’ is one who adheres “to an existing/former status or policy and refusing to consider proposals of change or reform.” And ‘riot’ is an ‘assembly that is seen by the law as a breach of peace, a terror to the public, and to execute and unlawful purpose.’ That is how the law defines those words. The word patriot is also “used for a factious disturber of the government.” In this sense, the government sees patriots who refuse to consider proposals of change or reform as a threat to its future endeavors.

patriot (n.)
1590s, “compatriot,” from French patriote (15c.) and directly from Late Latin patriota “fellow-countryman” (6c.), from Greek patriotes “fellow countryman,” from patrios “of one’s fathers,” patris “fatherland,” from pater (genitive patros) “father” (see father (n.)); with -otes, suffix expressing state or condition. Liddell & Scott write that patriotes was “applied to barbarians who had only a common [patris], [politai] being used of Greeks who had a common [polis] (or free-state).”

Meaning “loyal and disinterested lover and defender of one’s country and its interests” is attested from c. 1600, but it became an ironic term of ridicule or abuse from mid-18c. in England, so that Johnson, who at first defined it as “one whose ruling passion is the love of his country,” in his fourth edition added, “It is sometimes used for a factious disturber of the government.”

The name of patriot had become [c. 1744] a by-word of derision. Horace Walpole scarcely exaggerated when he said that … the most popular declaration which a candidate could make on the hustings was that he had never been and never would be a patriot. [Macaulay, “Horace Walpole,” 1833]

It was somewhat revived in reference to resistance movements in overrun countries in World War II, and it has usually had a positive sense in American English, where the phony and rascally variety has been consigned to the word patrioteer (1928).” –

pat –  In politics, to adhere obstinately to an existing status or policy, refusing to consider proposals of change or reform; stand still, in a blind or stubborn refusal to disturb existing conditions when they are profitable to one’s party or one’s self.” – 1889 Century Dictionary

riot – Specifically In law, an unlawful assembly which has actually begun to execute the purpose for which it assembled by a breach of the peace, and to the terror of the public, or a lawful assembly proceeding to execute an unlawful purpose…” – 1889 Century Dictionary

PAT’RIOTnoun [Latin patria, one’s native country, form pater, father.]
A person who loves his country, and zealously supports and defends it and its interests.” – Webster’s Dictionary 1828

I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.” – Naturalization Oath of Allegiance to the United States of America

“and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.” – KJV, Isa 9:6

“Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world” – KJV, Jhn 18:36

“Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.” – KJV, Jas 4:4

If you are not a “Christian” you already denounce Christ, but those who claim to be a ‘follower’ and also a ‘patriot’ have turned away His sovereignty. Being a Christian is following the example of Christ Jesus, but Jesus was not of this world [earthly kingdoms/governments, Satan’s world], and being part of it and actively participating in it is in fact renouncing Christ. Even His parents were not of this world, but they were subject to it [being subject to =/= being a subject of].

Christ Jesus, his Kingdom is not of this world [earthly kingdoms/governments], therefore his dominion is not of the United States nor any nation or state. He never participated in civil pursuits, and never registered to become a member under any nation. We are not to have membership of the world, for friendship of it is enmity with God, and this friendship is done by voluntarily enrolling/registering into it. Joseph sought to not make a public example of Mary; they wanted to stay private in the “heavenly register.” Some people will point to Luke 2:1-5 that mentions the decree by Caesar Augustus that all the world should be taxed [registered into the census] and that Joseph was taxed with Mary. In Luke 2:2 “this taxing” was so “that it might appear how much tax should be levied upon each one.” In order to tax someone they would need to be registered into the public [census]. In the original Greek translation the word for “tax” in the KJV means to register [voluntary enrollment], and it is understood as that this enrollment was in the “heavenly register” for Joseph and Mary. The public register of a nation is clearly not the heavenly register. It is more likely that Joseph with Mary claimed privacy on record that he was of the lineage of King David and had no intentions to participate in the public business world. Thayer’s Greek Lexicon makes the claim that in Luke 2:3 “all” went to enroll in the heavenly register, when it is biblically clear that did not happen. Joseph and Mary enrolled in the heavenly register, pronounced their privacy and complete adherence to God through the lineage of David (it is possible that Mary’s pregnancy prevented them from publicly registering). Then when Mary brought forth Jesus she “laid him in a manger; for there was no room for them in the inn”, and back then the inns were for those who were publicly registered and could be accounted for. A ‘manger’ is in a barn; “a trough or box in which fodder is laid for cattle”, and although Jesus never confronted problems of being an illegitimate child, “one conceived in a barn” is worldly considered a ‘bastard.’

“Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a publick example, was minded to put her away privily.” – KJV, Mat 1:19

“And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed.
(And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.)
And all went to be taxed, every one into his own city.
And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judaea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David: )
To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.
And so it was, that, while they were there, the days were accomplished that she should be delivered.
And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn.” – KJV, Luke 2:1-7

“STRONGS NT 583: ἀπογράφω [tax]
a. to write off, copy (from some pattern).
b. to enter in a register or records; specifically, to enter in the public records the names of men, their property and income, to enroll (cf. ἀπογραφή, b.); middle to have oneself registered, to enroll oneself [Winer’s Grammar, § 38, 3]: Luke 2:1, 3, 5; passive οἱ ἐν οὐρανοῖς ἀπογεγραμμένοι those whose names are inscribed in the heavenly register,”

“STRONGS NT 582: ἀπογραφή [taxing]
a. a writing off, transcript (from some pattern).
b. an enrolment (or registration) in the public records of persons together with their property and income, as the basis of an ἀποτίμησις (census or valuation), i. e. that it might appear how much tax should be levied upon each one: Luke 2:2; Acts 5:37; on the occurrence spoken of in both passages, cf. Schürer, Ntl. Zeitgesch. § 17, pp. 251, 262-286, and books there mentioned; [McClellan 1:392-399; B. D. under the word Taxing].” – Thayer’s Greek Lexicon

1. A trough or box in which fodder is laid for cattle, or the place in which horses and cattle are fed.”

B’ASTARDnoun A natural child; a child begotten and born out of wedlock; an illegitimate or spurious child. By the civil and canon laws, a bastard becomes a legitimate child, by the intermarriage of the parents, at any future time. But by the laws of this country, as by those of England, a child, to be legitimate, must at least be born after the lawful marriage.” – Webster’s 1828

bastard, noun
Word origin ME < OFr < bast- (also in fils de bast) (< ? Goth bansts, barn) + -ard,-ard: hence, one conceived in a barn” –

“Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help.”, Psalm 146:3. Protestant pastor David Guzik explains eloquently how leaders of this day are nothing to revere. I believe it’s not just the leaders of these days, but of all time. Either way he makes a good point here.

“Politicians of this day look for what they can get from you. Jesus looks for what He can do for you.

Leaders of this day surround themselves with servants. Jesus surrounds us with His servanthood.

Leaders of this day use their power to build their empire. Jesus uses his power to wash our feet and make us clean and comfortable.

Leaders of this day trade their influence for money. God so loved that he gave …

Generals of this day need regular wars to keep their weapons and skills up to date and insure their own advancement. Jesus brings peace and rest to hearts.

The higher the plane of importance one reaches in this world, the more inaccessible he becomes. Jesus was Emanuel, “God with us.”

Leaders of this day are desperate to be seen and heard. Jesus sought anonymity so He could be useful.

Obviously, Jesus is not in charge of the halls of Washington, London, Moscow, Baghdad, Paris or Bonn.” – David Guzik

The spiritual way of Christ involves not volunteering to be enrolled in the world of man [legal world, world of nations, Satan’s world], and Christ was obviously not of this world. If you are publicly registered it is your spiritual duty to abjure from it.

“Leave Babylon; flee from the Babylonians! Shout for joy as you tell it and announce it. Shout it out to the ends of the earth…” – GOD’S WORD Translation, Isa 48:20

You should not claim to be human

The information presented is not intended to encourage terrorism or a disregard towards the law or government.

Are you man or do you belong to man?

The term “human” was originally just an adjective referring to the form, characteristics, or aspects which belongs to man [of, or belonging to man]. Most modern dictionaries will show the adjective definition above the noun, hinting importance and indicating it’s precedence. The use of the term “human” as a noun to refer to a man was condemned by some authorities, describing it as an affectation, vulgar, jocular, manifesting suddenly and whimsically. They think it’s downright hilarious that the vulgar masses have suddenly taken claim to be of, or belonging to man instead of just being man. Later, ‘scholars’ proclaim the notion that human as an adjective and not a substantive is a double negative. In reality they are twisting the diction to aid in the enslavement of people through language. Interestingly the word “human”, since English belongs to the Germanic group, can be traced to the Gothic word “ghman” which means both slave and servant. And according to a definition that has been floating around the internet for over a decade, written by Frank O’Collins [Jesuit educated, nephew of Gerald O’Collins S.J.] who claims that the modern system of citation is fraudulent, the term ‘human being’ was created to distinguish “a lesser/inferior man or woman… as an animal or monster” who was under the laws of property as opposed to being “subject to the laws of free men.” Based on what I have researched, that definition should be considered.

“You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men.” 1 Cor 7:23

“human (adj.)
mid-15c., humainhumaigne, “human,” from Old French humainumain (adj.) “of or belonging to man” (12c.), from Latin humanus “of man, human,…” —

“human – 1. Having the qualities of a man. 2. Belonging to a man.“— The New Encyclopædia: or, Universal dictionary of Arts and Sciences 1807

“The use of human or humans for human being or human beings is severely condemned by some authorities and censured in varying degrees by most. The condemnations run from “affectation” and “jocularity” to “simply a vulgarism.”…” — A Dictionary of Contemporary American Usage 1957

“All live languages in accordance with their origin form a common linguistic ancestor, genetically; English belongs to the Germanic group… Gothic word ghman means both slave and servant, in other words it is a part of Germanic group (East Germanic) and the word semantically means man or human being of either sex.”  — Azad Hamawandy. Prefix (hu) as a Cognate Morpheme in Old English and Avestan. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 3, No. 4, 2015, pp. 239-243

“HUMAN BEING: From Latin ‘Humanus’: ‘a lesser/inferior man or woman defined legally as an animal and/or monster as distinct from the ancient (pre Vatican) Roman term homo: man.’ A key rule of Law from the 14th Century describing a fundamental legal fiction—that is the notion of an inferior man or woman as an animal (as defined by Papal Decree) and therefore not subject to the laws of free men, but the laws of property. The decision to create a 2nd word for Homo (man), denoting an inferior ‘animal’ man was crucial to the legal implementation of the Vatican global slave trade from the 14th Century—to overcome the questions of legality and morality of the Vatican slave trade. Therefore, unbaptized indigenous populations were legally defined as ‘humans’—therefore animals. Legally, the name of a human must always be in CAPITALS to identify that individual as property as distinct from a free man.” — Frank O’Collins,

Perhaps the writers of the New World Translation Bible of 1984 were trying to inform us of this notion.

“… Hear this, all ye people; give ear, all ye inhabitants of the world:
Both low and high, rich and poor, together.” — KJV, Psa 49:1-2

“Hear this, all you peoples. Give ear, all YOU inhabitants of the system of things,
YOU sons of humankind as well as YOU sons of man, YOU rich one and you poor one together.” — NWT (1984), Psa 49:1-2

“… we declare, say, determine and pronounce that for every human creature it is necessary for salvation to be subject to the authority of the Roman pontiff.” — Unam Sanctum, Pope Boniface VIII (1302)

The term hu-man, in it’s latin origin and in man’s law, means belonging to man. It is said that the New World Translation of 1984, in some aspects, is more adherent to legalese [the king’s language; the terms of art that controls us]. In Psalm 49:2 most Bibles say “Both low and high…”, but in the NWT it says “YOU sons of humankind as well as YOU sons of man…” To be hu-man means to be of/belonging to man’s “system of things” and not God. It is to be worldly. This is because you must take on and act in agency through a government issued [G.I., disposable government property] legal entity [person] that requires allegiance [submission] to man’s law above God’s. It is a lower heretical status to be a creation of man [human creature]. Satan’s world has manipulated us into adhering to these terms. It is not good to be “human.” We should be just “man”; a pure product of God without any additions [citizenship, legal identity, legal surname, etc].

The Roman Pontiff proclaims sovereignty over “every human creature.” This has not been recanted and has been repeated several times since 1302. Pope Boniface VIII intentionally chose the term “human creature” instead of “man.” I believe it is because the Roman Pontiff knows he does not have control over the pure man, but the man that volunteers to be part of ‘the world’ [a per-son, human being/creature, citizen, subject of secular nations/”the system of things”].

“human – Of the form and characteristics of man.” — Ballentine’s Legal Dictionary 3rd Edition

“human – 3. Belonging or relative to man as distinguished from God or superhuman beings; pertaining to the sphere or faculties of man (with implication of limitation or inferiority); mundane; secular. (Often opposed to divine.)” — Oxford New English Dictionary 1901

adj. [from world.]
1. Secular; relating to this life, in contradistinction to the life to come.
2. Bent upon this world; not attentive to a future state.
3. Human; common; belonging to the world.”

n.s. [ allegeance, Fr.]
1. The duty of subjects to the government.”

n.s. [from due.]
3. Obedience or submission due to parents, governors, or superiours; loyalty; piety to parents.”

n.s. [ obedience, Fr. obedientia, Latin.]
1. Obsequiousness; submission to authority; compliance with command or prohibition.

n.s. [ soumission, Fr. from submissus, Latin.]
1. Delivery of himself to the power of another.” — Johnson, Samuel. A Dictionary of the English Language. 1755, 1773

“belong, vb. 1. To be the property of a person or thing“— Black’s Law 9th

“Human being – Natural man: Unenlightened or unregenerate.

Unregenerate – Not regenerate; unrepentant; an unregenerate sinner; not convinced by or unconverted to a particular religion; wicked, sinful, dissolute.” — Random House Dictionary of the English Language 2nd Edition

“Natural – An idiot; one whom nature debars from understanding; a fool.” — Johnson, Samuel. A Dictionary of the English Language. 1755

“creature (n.)
c. 1300, “anything created,” hence “a thing” in general, animate or not, but most commonly “a living being,”…” —

“G.I. (adj.)
also GI, 1936 as an adjective meaning “U.S. Army equipment,” American English, apparently an abbreviation of Government Issue, and applied to anything associated with servicemen. Transferred noun sense of “U.S. Army soldier” arose during World War II (first recorded 1943), apparently from the jocular notion that the men themselves were manufactured by the government.
An earlier G.I. (1908) was an abbreviation of galvanized iron, especially in G.I. can, a type of metal trash can; the term was picked up by U.S. soldiers in World War I as slang for a similar-looking type of German artillery shells.” —

Scholars have speculated if “human” can be further traced before it’s Latin usage. The Latin term for human/humanist is “humanus” whereas man is “homo.” Some make the ‘educated guess’ that humanus derives from homo because the “u” and the “o” are interchangeable, but oddly only with those two words and none other. Others disagree and claim it comes from a combination of Hebrew words [huw’ and min] and pagan gods from Ancient Egypt; Hu and Min who were “among the false-Christ figures (god-men) of Egypt’s several false-trinities.” Hu was the power of the spoken word, and personified divine utterance; the voice of authority. Hu was also seen as a creator, for when he expelled his breath the sound was that of his name, and creation took place. “Of or belonging to” is synonymous to being a “creation of.” The notion of the prefix ‘hu’ in “human” being derived from the Egyptian god Hu is a possibility. In Hebrew the word “he” is “huw'” and pronounced “hoo” like the god Hu. Min, on the other hand, was a sky god and god of fertility and harvest. In Hebrew ‘min’ means heretic. According to Gail Riplinger in his book The Language Of The King James Bible, combining the Egyptian gods with the Hebrew words “Hu/huw'” and “Min/min” leads to “human” with the common English pronunciation “hu • min.” In this sense, human can be defined as a pagan created heretic.

“… ‘Humanism’ comes from humanus which comes from homo. Although modern linguists can question whether Latin “o” can change into “u”, both terms have been regarded as relating with one another since antiquity which is what matters here… There is no other evidence of an “o” changing into a “u” in Latin phonology.” — HOMO, HUMANUS, AND THE MEANING OF ‘HUMANISM’ by Vito R. Giustiniani

“הוּא hûwʼ, hoo;… — he, as for her, him(-self), it, the same, she (herself), such, that (…it), these, they, this, those, which (is), who.” — Strong’s Definitions, H1931

“מִין, min — heretic” —

“… The word ‘human’ can be traced back to Hu and Min, the man-faced deity of the Egyptians. When Humanity Comes of Age, one of the most popular New Age books promoting the divinity of man, depicts Hu, the Egyptian god-man on the cover. Along with Horus, Hu and Min were among the false-Christ figures (god-men) of Egypt’s several false-trinities.

Just as Abel was the first to be called hu (Hebrew for ‘he’) so the Egyptian counterfeit, Hu, and all of his followers throughout history are called ‘hu’ and noted in Isaiah 9:15 (“the prophet that teacheth lies, he [Hebrew ‘hu’] is the tail.”)

‘Human’ is usually pronounced hu • min, not hu • man.
It does not come from the word ‘man.’

The Hebrew term for heretic is min. Hu and Min were no doubt derived from the vowel-less Hebrew ‘hm’ for Ham. It can be seen in the earlier Old French as hu • main and in Latin as ho • min.

New Age tee-shirts, emblazoned with the word ‘Human,’ depict a divinized person who is sexless, raceless, and ageless…” — The Language Of The King James Bible by Gail Riplinger, pg. 113

“The Egyptian god Hu was one of the minor gods in some respects, but he was one of the most important gods for those serious about Egyptian deities. Hu is the power of the spoken word. He personifies the authority of utterance.

Hu and Sia were partners. Sia was the personification of Divine Knowledge/Omniscience, the mind of the gods. Hu was the personification of Divine Utterance, the voice of authority. During Ancient times, Heka, the personification of Divine Power accompanied these two gods. Together, the three gods were very important to the rulers of Ancient Egypt. 

… some legends maintain that he was not just a part of creation, but that he was the creator. It is said that as Hu drew his first breath, there was in that sound the essence of his name. Hence, we have the name Hu, which sounds remarkably like the sound of an expelling breath.” — The Egyptian God, Hu by Catherine C. Harris

Charles Thomson, the man who talked the truth, refused to release an insider definitive history on the American Revolution to protect the agendas of the Jesuit Vatican Empire

The information presented is not intended to encourage terrorism or a disregard towards the law or government.

The man best qualified to become our country’s greatest historian, certainly the man with the most complete access to primary sources in the Revolutionary cause, was Charles Thomson. An authentic classical scholar, a discreet Protestant steeped in Medici learning, Thomson was known as “Perpetual Secretary of the Continental Congress.” He inscribed minutes of every Congressional session from 1774 until ratification of the Constitution in 1789. With William Barton, a Freemason, he designed the Great Seal of the United States of America: the choice of its Virgilian mottoes is credited exclusively to Thomson.

Among his contemporaries, Charles Thomson’s name was synonymous with Truth. So accurate were his minutes of Pennsylvania’s negotiations with the Delaware Indians that the Delawares called him Wegh-wu-law-mo-end, “the man who talks the truth.” When he would take his daily reports of congressional proceedings to the streets, eager mobs would cry “Here comes Charles Thomson! Here comes the Truth!”

Once the Constitution was ratified, Charles Thomson retired to Harriton, his country home in Bryn Mawr. He destroyed his personal papers relative to the creation of the new republic. An article by Kenneth Boling in the Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography (1976) says that Thomson actually wrote a lengthy history of the Revolution, which he also destroyed. Thomson biographer J. Edwin Hendricks of Wake Forest suggests a fate other than destruction, alluding to “persistent rumors that the Thomson papers are in the Pennsylvania Masonic records.” (Professor Hendricks assured me personally that numerous inquiries have failed to reflect Thomson’s membership in Pennsylvania Masonry.)
Whether Thomson destroyed his history or surrendered it to the crypt of secrecy, it is clear that he knew there were certain elements in the formation of American government that must, must be ignored. “If the truth were known,” he told friends darkly, “many careers would be tarnished and the leadership of the nation would be weakened.”

And so Charles Thomson occupied the remaining forty years of his life translating the Septuagint, the Greek-language Bible, into English. Still, he was frequently requested to write the definitive insider’s history of the Revolution. Dr. Benjamin Rush overheard Thomson’s reply to one such request and recorded it in his diary:

“No,” said he, “I ought not, for I should contradict all the histories of the great events of the Revolution, and shew by my account of men, motives and measures, that we are wholly indebted to the agency of Providence [Jesuit Vatican Empire] for its successful issue. Let the world admire the supposed wisdom and valor of our great men. Perhaps they may adopt the qualities that have been ascribed to them, and thus good may be done. I shall not undeceive future generations.”— Rulers of Evil: Useful Knowledge About Governing Bodies by F. Tupper Saussy, 1999

Wickedness of govern-ment

The information presented is not intended to encourage terrorism or a disregard towards the law or government.

Here is just one example of absolute evil and the inversion of Reality within the legal realm; man’s law, Satan’s world, hell.

In setting up a fiction, the law requires us to take an actual situation and imagine it to be different from what it really is, either by thinking of nonexistent elements as added to it or by thinking of existing elements as removed from it, so as to permit the application of legal maxims which refer only to the situation as thus transformed. Its purpose in doing this is to make it possible to decide cases according to analogy when a direct ruling does not apply. The whole nature of legal fictions is determined by this purpose, and they are sustained only so far as it requires. The legislator and the judge always remain aware that the fictitious situation does not correspond to reality. So it is also with the so-called dogmatic fiction that is employed in jurisprudence to permit legal facts to be systematically classified and related to each other. Here again, the situation is thought of as existing, but it is not assumed to exist.“— The Theory Of Money And Credit by LUDWIG VON MISES

“legal fiction
nsomething asssumed in law to be fact irrespective of the truth or accuracy of that assumption.”— Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law, 1996

“legal fiction:
a rule assuming as true something that is clearly false. A fiction is often used to get around the provisions of constitutions and legal codes that legislators are hesitant to change or to encumber with specific limitations. Thus, when a legislature has no legal power to sit beyond a certain midnight but has five hours more of work still to do, it is easier to turn back the official clock from time to time than it is to change the law or constitution.

In ancient Rome, where every family needed a male heir, the lack of one was overcome through the legal fiction of adoption. In England, when courts handling civil cases were full, the Court of Queen’s (or King’s) Bench, a criminal court, could take some of the load by pretending that the defendant in a simple civil suit had been arrested and was in custody.

Almost any legal fiction can be stated in terms of fact. Thus, the fiction that a corporation is, for many purposes, a person separate from its members is equivalent to saying that, for those purposes, the law deals with the group as a unit, disregarding for the moment the group’s individual members as such.”— Universalium, 2010

“Res judicata facit ex albo nigrum, ex nigro album, ex curvo rectum, ex recto curvum. A thing adjudged makes what was white, black; what was black, white; what was crooked straight; what was straight, crooked.” — Bouvier’s Law Dictionary Adapted To The Constitution of the United States, 1856

Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness;
Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!
“— Isa 5:20

Legal maxims are essentially foundational rules the magi-strates and legislators follow when administrating their artifice. This Beast System needs wickedness to live, for if they are made to adhere to actual Truths of Reality, instead of playing pretend adhering to fictions and artifice, the legitimacy of its sorcery would dwindle and fail.

Welcome to the ‘baly’. I hope you like enduring ‘danger’.

(1) Evil; sorrow.
(4) Dominion; government.”

(1) Lordship, or dominion; the power which the feudal lord has over his vassals.”— A Dictionary of Archaic and Provincial Words: Obsolete Phrases, Proverbs, and Ancient Customs, from the XIV Century, 1904

“danger (n.)
mid-13c., daunger, “arrogance, insolence;” c. 1300, “power of a lord or master, jurisdiction,” from Anglo-French daunger, Old French dangier “power, power to harm, mastery, authority, control” (12c., Modern French danger), alteration (due to association with damnum) of dongier, from Vulgar Latin *dominarium “power of a lord,” from Latin dominus “lord, master,” from domus “house” (from PIE root *dem- “house, household”).”—

2. A subject; a dependent.”— Webster’s 1828 Dictionary
[Citizens are considered subjects. The term “nationals” is now used in place of “subjects” according to American Law and Procedure: Constitutional Law Vol. 12]

“… it is to be noticed that the term subject is capable of a different and wider application, in which it includes all members of the body politic, whether they are citizens (i.e., subjects stricto sensu) or resident aliens. All such persons are subjects, all being subject to the power of the state and to its jurisdiction, and as owing to it, at least temporarily, fidelity and obedience.”— Black’s Law 9th

A public civil officer, invested with the executive government or some branch of it. In this sense, a king is the highest or first magistrate as is the President of the United States. But the word is more particularly applied to subordinate officers, as governors, intendants, prefects, mayors, justices of the peace, and the like.”— Webster’s 1828 Dictionary

Your last name is a flattering title under the Beast System.

The information presented is not intended to encourage terrorism or a disregard towards the law or government.

A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles – Founded Mainly on the Materials Collected by the Philological Society (1888), Jonathan Swift – Th. on Var. Subj. (1706),
When a man is made a spiritual peer he loses his sir-name; when a temporal, his christian-name.

We have become so acquainted with our surname that “we commonly think no more of them than we do of our noses, or the length of our feet.” Most people see it as a natural concept and even have pride for their surname. In the vernacular, a person’s last name, or surname, is an additional name placed after his first name [Christian name, God-given name] to help identify the individual. The beginning use of it in history was correlated with their family/tribe, as in Son of Nun, or local/place-name, as in Simon the Canaanite; to distinguish from those with the same first name. Soon after the tenth century A.D. the use of permanent patronyms [“William’s John” or “John-William’s-son”/Williamson] begins to become a necessity for certain legal enactments. Later, nations sanction surnames for the rights, privileges, and subjection of the law. It then became a “custom” in law to attribute new births with a surname. The legal realm recognizes this last name as being over and above, superior to your first name/God-given name, for it cannot govern what is Natural [the first name considered Natural; of nature; distinguishing a living man created by an Act of God, His gift of life]— it can only govern what it creates [government’s sanction surnames indicating a legal entity for business/civil life; a per-son, a hu-man, a legal participant] and man’s law can only create artifice. The surname was, and still is, required for civil purposes and in this sense was always sanctioned by the sovereign. In some instances those who did not want to subject themselves to the system, without surname insinuation attaching him to a secular nation, had no protection of the law, could not fully participate in commerce, and were at risk of being persecuted or becoming enslaved. But those who lived in concordance with Yehovah with the knowledge exceeding that of the scribes [satanic writers of man’s law] were able to shield themselves from it’s false assumptions, as Jesus has shown us by walking on water which can be metaphoric for the sea of commerce, revealing how one can prevent himself from drowning in secular debt obligations; not just in respect of money but also the obligation of knowing and following all public laws and codes of his secular nation.

The fixing of personal names, and, in particular, permanent patronyms [surnames], as legal identities seems, everywhere, to have been, broadly-speaking, A STATE PROJECT [secular government, of men]. As an early and imperfect legal identification, the permanent patronym was linked to such vital administrative functions as tithe and tax collection, property registers, conscription lists, and census rolls.

The rise of the permanent patronym is inextricably associated with those aspects of state-making in which it was desirable to be able to distinguish individual (male) subjects: tax collection (including tithes), conscription, land revenue, court judgements, witness records, and police work.” The Production of Legal Identities Proper to States: The Case of the Permanent Family Surname, Yale University

Custom gives one ‘his father’s family name [surname], and such prxnomina [given name, Christian name] as his parents choose to put before it, but this is only general rule, from which individual may, depart, if he choose. In re‘” — Cohen, 142 Misc. 852, 255 N.Y.S. 616, 617., Black’s Law 4th

CUSTOM. A usage or practice of the people, which, by common adoption and acquiescence, and by long and unvarying habit, has become compulsory, and has acquired the force of a law with respect to the place or subject-matter to which it relates.” — Black’s Law 4th

tradition (n)
6. A CUSTOM handed down from one age or generation to another and having acquired almost the force of law.“— 1889 Century Dictionary

Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after THE TRADITION OF MEN, AFTER THE RUDIMENTS OF THE WORLD, and not after Christ.”— Col 2:8

We name a thing andbang!it leaps into existence. Each name a perfect equation with its roots. A perfect congruence with its reality. (Yolland and Owen)
But remember that words are signals, counters. They are not immortal. And it can happen to use— an image you’ll understand — it can happen that a civilization can be imprisoned in a linguistic contour which no longer matches the landscape of… fact. (Hugh)
I’ll decode you yet. (Yolland)” Brian Friel, Translations (London: Faber and Faber, 1981)

Today the only real reason people have a surname is for the insinuation of themselves into man’s law for civil purposes, i.e. commerce, judicial proceedings [a stage play], legal protections and privilege. It insinuates you into man’s legal existence. To have an additional name for rights and privileges of a nation, granted by the temporal gods [administrative agents of government] is a flattering title, for those without it do not have that luxury. It is a mark [a ‘trade-mark of commerce’] signifying you belong to a nation, and thus the Roman Pontiff, and are under it’s dominion. The last name causes spiritual distress on the man who volunteers into it, for that which is “last” is also considered a burden in law. It takes you out of God’s protection, out of Nature, and places you under the subjection of the artificial legal beast system, Satan’s world [man’s law, secular nations, the Jesuit Vatican Empire]. Many elites of this world don’t identify with surnames, they are private, but they also will act in a public status [with the required surname], sometimes through living trusts, for civil purposes. World leaders are chosen directly and indirectly [by the Jesuit Vatican Empire] to administrate the common people through acting in agency to specific corporation soles which are the highest status of persons in their nation.

personal name. An individual’s name or names given at birth, as distinguished from a family name. – Also termed given name; (in the Western tradition) first name; (in the Christian tradition) Christian name. Cf. surname.” — Black’s Law 8th

The name given at the font [fountain/baptism], distinct from the Gentilitious name, or surname.” — 1755 Samuel Johnson English Dictionary 1st Edition

“The name given at christening; the personal name, as distinguished from the family name or surname…
…1727 Pope Th. on Var. Subj., When a man is made a spiritual peer he loses his sir-name; when a temporal, his christian-name. The Oxford English Dictionary 1933

last, n. Hist. 1. A burden.”— Black’s Law 9th

“<L. super, over, + nomen, name..] An additional name, frequently descriptive..; specifically, a name or appellation added to the baptismal or Christian name, and becoming a family name.” — 1889 Century Dictionary

“The name of one’s family, or an epithet added to one’s christian name, to denominate the person of such a family.” — 1757 Buchanan, New English Dictionary

A name over and above the baptismal or Christian name; the family name of and individual; an appellation added to the original name.” — 1896 Charels Annadale, English Dictionary

“The name of the family; the name which one has over and above the Christian name.” — 1755 Samuel Johnson English Dictionary 1st Edition

Additional name of descriptive or allusive kind attached to a person & sometimes becoming hereditary: the name common to all members of a family.” — 1919 The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English

“1. A name which is added to the christian name, and which, in modern
times, have become family names. 2. They are called surnames, because originally they were written over the name in judicial writings and contracts. They were and are still used for the purpose of distinguishing persons of the same name. They were taken from something attached to the persons assuming them, as John Carpenter, Joseph Black, Samuel Little, &c. See Name.” — 1856 Bouvier’s Law Dictionary

insinuation— 1. The act of insinuating; a creeping or winding in; a tortuous or stealthy passage, as into crevices, or (figuratively) into favor or affection.” — 1889 Century Dictionary

INSINUARE [in sin u are]— insinuare (in-sin-yoo-air-ee), vb.[Latin] Roman & civil law. To register; to deposit (an instrument [i.e. a birth certificate]) with a public registry.” — Blacks Law 8th

REGISTERrights which a king has by virtue of his prerogative.” —

2) obligation to deliver particular goods or perform certain acts according to an agreement, such as returning a favor.” —

“1. That which is due from one person to another, whether money, goods, or services, and whether payable at present or at a future time; that which one person is bound to pay to or perform for another; what one is obliged to do or to suffer; a due; a duty; an obligation.

2. The state of being under obligation to make payment, as of money or services, to another; figuratively, the state of being under obligation in general.

3. An offense requiring reparation or expiation; default of duty: a trespass; a sin.” — 1889 Century Dictionary

“… It is reasonably clear that what we are witnessing, in the cataso exercise, are the first stages of an administrative crystallization of personal surnames. And the geography of this crystallization traced, almost perfectly, the administrative presence of the Florentine state… The small, tightly-knit vernacular world had no need for a ‘proper name’: such names were, for all practical purposes, official names confined to administrative life… As the case of Florence illustrates, the naming project, like the standardization of measurements and cadastral surveys, was very much a purposeful state mission.

… However, the surname system that emerged involved the use of hereditary and fixed last names. This fact is crucial to understanding the importance of patronyms with respect to the state. Indeed, the development of patronyms helped enforce private property rights, advance primogeniture regimes, and secure the ability of the state to make its subjects legible to its gaze.
The use of last names did not become common until well after the Norman Conquest. Social norms developed by the twelfth century dictated that it was a disgrace for a proper gentleman not to have a last name. The use of patronyms then spread, albeit unevenly, with the implementation of the poll tax under Richard II and the legal requirement of baptismal registration by Henry VIII.
… A closer analysis of the process of surname diffusion also reveals the link between the English naming system and the securing of private property rights. In a bargain that replicates itself in many other nations, the aristocracy gained security for their property rights by adopting heritable patronyms. Their new legal identity was a political resource in their claim to property in land and office. By the middle of the thirteenth century, a large proportion of large and medium landowners in England possessed hereditary last names.

Notice, also, that the normal, modem, institutional setting for birth and, hence, for the birth certificate forms, is the maternity ward of a hospital, where state-like bureaucratic routines for the collection of vital statistics prevail. When, by contrast, most children are born at home, with or without professional care, the official registration of births is that much more complex. Modern, formal institutions are handmaidens to the creation and hegemony of official patronyms. The hegemony of state-structured institutions such as schools, social security, military service, taxpaying, property registration and transfer provide the “traffic patterns” that ensure the dominance of state-identification practices. It is in most citizens’ interest to be duly recorded whenever state institutions have the power to provide a benefit or to diminish or cancel a penalty. Official identities, then, constitute an iron cage enclosing a great deal of social life in the contemporary modern state. The Production of Legal Identities Proper to States: The Case of the Permanent Family Surname, Yale University

“… The upper classes in nearly every case took their names from their territorial descriptions. Those outside the landholding classes had no need for surnames till a later date. They were never mentioned in a legal deed, and their Christian names, and perhaps nicknames, answered all distinctive purposes amoungst the few friends and neighbors who comprised the small circle of their acquaintance. They lived and died and were forgotten. A moment’s thought will show that this was so. Even at the present day there are hundreds of the lower classes who are only known by a Christian name and a nickname, and who find that the only occasion on which they [common persons] have the slightest use or opportunity of using a surname are their registration of birth, occasional for the purpose of marriage, at their appearances in the police-courts, and for the inquest at their death…” — 1889, The Genealogical Magazine, Vol. 2, A Treatise On The law Concerning Names And Changing Of Names

“This proprietorship is not so well known or understood as it ought to be; and the honourable member for Sheffield fell into a prevalent, but erroneous opinion on the subject, when he stated from his place in Parliament, that “any man has a right to take any name he pleases, upon any occasion he pleases, and for any reason he pleases.” This is not the case; and from time immemorial the Crown has been called upon either to sanction or veto the assumption of surnames. This right the Crown still possesses.

In America even, with all its lawless license, the America, countenance of the law was necessary to make the assumption of a name legal for social and commercial purposes [this legal name, or full name, must contain a surname, and it is officially written in all caps]. On this American question the Spectator says :—” In America the change requires an Act of the State Legislature ; and, to save trouble, all applications are lumped together in one schedule [and] passed as the Houses rise. The result is a little comic, as the practice is extended to Christian names[first name, given name], and Sukeys become Sophonisbas, and Sallys Armintas, with a sudden and frequency a little amusing to the Englishmen.”— The Spector, June 21, 1862, Surnames & Sirenames. The Origin And History Of Certain Family & Historical names

“Name changes, both of a voluntary and involuntary nature, create problems for the genealogist. Most East and Central European Jews used patronymics (e.g., Moshe ben Amram). Surnames were rare, unless the family was in commerce, and traveling between cities. Around 1800, the governments in Central Europe began to demand surnames for the Jews. By 1844, Russia and Poland mandated that surnames be registered. However, even these names underwent a metamorphosis when they passed through the immigration gates of America. Hardly able to understand the heavily accented pronunciation of names, immigration officials wrote down phonetic sounds as they heard them. They would anglicize, change, or shorten names, as the mood struck them.” —Encyclopaedia Judaica 2nd edition

“By a decree of July 20, 1808, the public authorities aimed to force Jews born before 1792 to declare their civil identity in order that they should not escape the obligations (notably military obligations) that citizenship now entailed. For this reason, the decree not only prescribed the adoption of a fixed forename and surname by those who had not previously had these, but also required all Jews to declare their civil status to the mayor of their commune, so that he could inscribe them in a special register.” — Documenting Individual Identity: The Development Of State Practices In The Modern World

People were influenced to choose surnames by the introduction of a poll tax [head tax] in 1379 where everyone aged 16 and over had their name recorded. And in 1413 the Statute of Additions required all legal documents not just to give a person’s name but also occupation and place of abode.” — A Short History of UK Personal Names

“The law of surnames may be concisely stated: there is none at all. But nevertheless, though there is no positive law on the subject, it may not be uninteresting to inquire into the usages [of surnames] which have arisen during the course of time, and which stand in the place of legal enactment. The use of surnames is an institution which has grown up so gradually, and has fulfilled its purpose so unobtrusively and well, that it has entirely escaped the attention of the legislature. There is one positive enactment only concerning the assumption of surnames, and it refers to a very limited district…

Lax as the practice with regard to armorial bearings is, and deplorable as it must appear to any true herald, it is undoubtedly a fact that the right to an ancestral coat of arms is strictly limited to the descendants of the first grantee… But the halcyon days of true heraldry have departed, it is to be feared, for ever; though, while protection is afforded by law to mere trade-marks of commerce [surnames], it seems an anomaly that the trade-marks, so to speak, of ancestry should go unprotected.” — The Law of Surnames. The Gentleman’s Magazine 243, October 1878

One of the predisposing factors to the formation of English surnames was the official survey made by William in 1086, which was afterwards compiled in a book called “The Domesday Book.” Men found themselves in this survey obliged to give some distinguishing name other than their personal name, and thus began the custom of men having a “to-name,” as it was sometimes quaintly called, meaning “added-to.”
Surnames have been made the subject of legal enactment for

As population increased and intercourse [legal intercourse] became general, it became necessary to employ some further name by which one man might be known from another, and in process of time the use of surnames became universal, the only exceptions in England being the members of the royal family, who sign by their baptismal names only.

… But after the negro or any one else in this country [America]
has once assumed his surname or it has been thrust upon him by
custom, he must retain it for all civil purposes
unless he secures
legislative enactment or judicial decree to change it.
… All of the landed estates of a nation, all of the civic procedure, as well as all of the social observances, are bound up in the name-customs of the country.” — Surname Book and Racial History 1918

“The world in which we live in comprises several orders, among them the social, the political, the ecclesiastical, the military and the economic. The last name is referred to in everyday usage as the business world. Business administration is considered exclusively with the economic order, therefor at the outset it is necessary to have some general idea of what the business world is and how it operates.

Just as the social order is composed of all the individual human beings in the world the economic order is made up of all the individual business units in the business world. Each unit is regarded as a separate economic entity and the sum of all the economic entitles at one moment constitutes the business universe or economic order. Each economic unit is regarded as separate and distinct from all others. The true significance and meaning of economic entities may best be grasped by an analogy with social entities or human beings, who make up the social order.

Hence, every economic entity or business unit must receive at it’s inception a birth certificate, so to speak, pronouncing its birth as a legal entity, in order to be recognized by the law as in esse (in existence). From the date of its inception, the business unit will be able to avail itself of the law to protect its rights, and will be amenable to the law to perform its duties and uphold its responsibilities to other economic legal entities.” — Management And The Law by Samuel Fox, 1966 pg. 13-14

To spiritually legitimize having a surname some Christians will point to parts of The Bible, like how Jesus “surnamed” Simon Peter, but that notion is incorrect. Misconceptions of the Bible can be attributed to misinterpreting it’s allegorical rhetoric and misleading transliterations. In the ancient languages people spoke and authors wrote in metaphor and allegories to aid in understanding. The original writers of The Bible commonly used allegories as a rhetorical device, but as time passed languages became used more literally and the later versions of these books have been intentionally vernacularize by the Vatican, Jesuits, Jesuit coadjutors, Freemasons, and King James— an effeminate homosexual freemason who did not favor how the Geneva bible negatively portrayed rulers of nations. So it is up to The Bible reader to do his due diligence, through studying the allegorical usage of the writers and looking into the lexicons and concordances to distinguish intentional false transliterations in order to decipher it’s true intent.

In The Bible the hebrew word “כָּנָה kânâh” is used 4 times in the KJV as 2 translated usages, “surname” and “flattering titles.” This fact alone indicates a relation to surnames being flattering titles. Strong’s Definitions describes the word, “to address by an additional name; hence, to eulogize:—give flattering titles, surname (himself).”  Gesenius’ Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon defines the term as, “(1) to address kindly, to call (any one) kindly. (2) to flatter.”, whereas Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon defines it as, “betitle, title, given an epithet or cognomen.”

In Isaiah 44:5 “כָּנָה kânâh” represents an honorable call and is used in a good way, but translated into the bad term “surname.” This was done to make the commoners think that it is acceptable to have a surname under a nation and still adhere to God.

Verses 32:21-22 of the Book of Job uses the term in a bad sense, a “flattering title”, as exalting one in his own estimation; artificially legitimizing what one claims to be in which he is not in Reality. Claiming to be a citizen of a nation is not who you are in the Reality of Nature, for a citizen [legal status] is an artificial creation of law, and what is Real cannot be of artifice.

In Mark 3:16 Jesus gave Simon a Christian name [first name], as opposed to a surname, Peter. The Greek words applied are “ἐπιτίθημι”, which means ‘to put or lay upon’, and “ὄνομα” [omitted from the KJV] which means ‘proper name’ or ‘name.’ Depending on the usage of the term “proper name” it can mean the given name or surname. In Roman law the first/given name was the proper name. Some might claim that ‘Peter’ is Simon’s last name in the sense that it is placed last and considered over and above his original name, but it is meant to be a given name and not a surname that is sanctioned by a temporal sovereign for “legal enactment.” Jesus cannot give a man a surname, for surnames were always “an aspect of state-making” and have always been sanctioned by the sovereign entity of a nation for “civil purposes.” This is another attempt by the writers of the later versions, i.e. KJV, to make the use of secular surnames acceptable under God. In the Geneva Bible, Mark 3:16 is transliterated as “And the first was Simon, and hee named, Peter,..” as opposed to the KJV, “And Simon he surnamed Peter;…” Again, this KJV transliteration was to aid in manipulating people into accepting a surname under a gentile nation.

“The impact of the annotations and commentary in the Geneva Bible cannot be underestimated. The Calvinist notes of the Geneva Bible infuriated King James I at Hampton Court in 1604, prompting him to authorize a group of Puritan scholars to produce a version of the Bible without annotation for him; ironically, the excellent Authorized Version might never have been written were it not for King James’s antipathy toward the Geneva Bible.

The marginal notes of the Geneva Bible present a systematic Biblical worldview centered on the Sovereignty of God over all of His creation including churches and kings. This unique Biblical emphasis, though fraught with dangers beyond spiritual debates (i.e., political and social pressure), was one of John Calvin’s great contributions to the English Reformers. For example, the marginal note in the Geneva Bible for Exodus 1:19 indicated that the Hebrew midwives were correct to disobey the Egyptian rulers. King James called such interpretations “seditious.” The tyrant knew that if the people could hold him accountable to God’s Word, his days as a king ruling by “Divine Right” were numbered, but Calvin and the Reformers defended the clear meaning of Scripture against whims of king or popes…” — 2006 print, 1599 Geneva Bible, The History And Impact Of The Geneva Bible

On the west wall of the lodge hall used by Lodge Scoon and Perth No. 3 in Perth, Scotland can be found a mural depicting James VI kneeling at their altar at his initiation. The oldest existing record of the Lodge, called “The Mutual Agreement” of 24 December, 1658, records that James was “entered freemason and Fellowcraft of the Lodge of Scoon” on 15 April, 1601.” —

The first edition of the King James Bible, which was edited by Francis Bacon [aka Sir Tobie Matthew, S.J] and prepared under Masonic supervision, bears more Mason’s marks than the Cathedral of Strasburg.” — Manly P. Hall, from a lecture Rosicrucian and Masonic Origins 1929

כָּנָה kânâh, kaw-naw’; a primitive root; to address by an additional name; hence, to eulogize:—give flattering titles, surname (himself).” — Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible

“(1) to address kindly, to call (any one) kindly Isa 44:5, Isa 45:4… (2) to flatter. Job 32:21, 22.” — Gesenius’ Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon

[כָּנָה] verb, Pi`el, betitle, title, give an epithet or cognomen.
Pi`el Imperfect1singular suffix בִשְׁמֶ֑ךָ אֲכַנְּךָוָאֶקְרָא לְךָ Isaiah 45:4 I have called thee by thy name, giving thee a title (of honour; compare for construction Dr§ 163); 3 masculine singular וּבְשֵׁם יִשְׂרָאֵל יְכַנֶּה Isaiah 44:5, and with the name Israel he titles (himself), is hardly possibly; absolute he betitles, or makes use of a title, is unlikely; read probably
כָּנָה, verb, Pu’al, see below, in bad sense = give a flattering title: וְאֶלאָֿדָם לֹא אֲכַנֶּה Job 32:21 ‘and unto man I do not give flattering titles’ (“” אַללֿנָא אֶשָּׂא פְנֵי אִישׁ); absolute, Job 32:22. ” — Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon, Unabridged

a. to put or lay upon:… Mark 3:16

ὄνομα, ὀνόματος… cf. Latin nomen (English name), with the prefixed omicron ὀ (but see Curtius, § 446)), the Sept. for שֵׁם (from Homer down), the name by which a person or a thing is called, and distinguished from others;
1. universally: of proper names [for Simon, not a surname], Mark 3:16″ — Thayer’s Greek Lexicon

The first name (prcenomen) was the proper name of the individual; the second (nomen) indicated the gees or tribe to which he belonged; while the third (cognomen) denoted his family or house. The agnomen was added on account of some particular event, as a further distinction.” — Black’s 4th

Simply looking at the terms attributed to the word ‘surname’ is telling, especially when considering that it is in fact a flattering title. The latin term for surname is ‘cognomen’. In the vernacular the first prefix is said to be of ‘com’ which means ‘with, together’, but the actual spelling of it is ‘cog’ which refers to trickery, flattery, falsehood, cheat, deception, artifice [it is logical to conclude that both prefixes ‘com’ and ‘cog’ are simultaneously in use here]. ‘Nomen’, rooted from ‘no-men’, means ‘name’ or sometimes a name of a tribe/family group. Evidently the term ‘nickname’ is referred as to surname. And ‘nick’ signifies ‘a notch [a mark]’, ‘the devil’ and to ‘cheat’.

cog (kog), v.; pret. and pp. cogged, ppr. cogging. [Not found in ME.; perhaps from W. coegio, make void, trick, pretend, <coeg, empty, vain, sausy, silly, foolish: To empty into a wooden vessel..]
I. trans. 1. To flatter; wheedle; seduce or win by adulation or artifice.
2. To obtrude or thrust by falsehood or deception; foist; palm: usually with in or on.
3. To adapt ( a die) by cheating, by loading it, as to direct its fall: as, to play with cogged dice.
II. intrans. 1. To wheedle; flatter; dissimulate. To cheat, especially by means of loaded dice.” — Century Dictionary 1889

COGverb transitive
1. To flatter; to wheedle; to seduce or draw from, by adulation or artifice.
2. To obtrude or thrust in, by falsehood or deception; as, to cog in a word to serve a purpose. To cog a die, to secure it so as to direct its fall; to falsify; to cheat in playing dice.
COGverb intransitive
1. To deceive; to cheat; to lie.
2. To wheedle.” — Webster’s Dictionary 1828

nomen (noh-men or -m,m), n. [Latin] l. Roman law. A personal name. A Roman citizen generally had three names: a praenomen (“first name”), a nomen (“the name of the family group”), and cognomen (“a surname”). 2. Hist. A person’s first name. 3. More broadly, any name.” — Black’s Law 9th

cognomen (n.),
1754, “a distinguishing name;” 1809, “a surname;” from Latin, from assimilated form of com “with, together” (see com-) + (g)nomen “name” (from PIE root *no-men- “name”). The last of the three names by which a Roman citizen was known (Caius Julius Csar, Marcus Tullius Cicero).” —

agnomen (ag-noh-m<ln). [Latin]l. An additional name or title; a nickname. 2. Roman law. An additional name, given in recognition of some achievement or to reflect adoption by a different gens.” – Black’s Law 7th

surname. 1. The name of the family, the name which one has over and above the Christian name; an appellation added to the original name.” — 1797 Sheridian, A Complete Dictionary of the English Language

NICKNAMEnoun [G. To banter. Signifies to surname, to call by a name of reproach.] A name given in contempt, derision or reproach; an opprobrious appellation.” – Webster’s 1828

1. A hollow cut or slight depression made in the surface of anything; a notch [a mark].
9. The devil: usually with the addition of Old. [Old St. Nick; Santa Clause]
12. To delude or deceive; cozen; cheat, as at dice.
14. To fit; unite or combine; be adapted for combining: said, in stock-breeding, of the crossing of one strain of blood with another.” – 1889 Century Dictionary

The surname (cognomen) is an additional name (agnomen) signifying adoption by a nation (gens); the taking from one parent, God, to another, Satan. Regardless of your religion, if you are of a nation you are a gentile which the surname also signifies. And yes, even the majority of jews are gentiles.

GENS. – Race; nation; great family. In Roman law, a subdivision of the people next to the euria, and constituting a number of familiae.”

GENTILES. – In the Roman law, the members of a gens or common tribe, and to whom the property of a deceased member anciently belonged, failing any sui haeredes or agnati.” — Rapalje, A Dictionary_ of American and English Law Vol 1. 1888

[Latin gentilis; from Latin gens, nation, race; applied to pagans.]
In the scriptures, a pagan; a worshiper of false gods; any person not a Jew or a christian; a heathen. The Hebrews included in the term goyim or nations, all the tribes of men who had not received the true faith, and were not circumcised. The christians translated goyim by the Latin gentes, and imitated the Jews in giving the name gentiles to all nations who were not Jews nor christians. In civil affairs, the denomination was given to all nations who were not Romans.
Pertaining to pagans or heathens.” — Webster’s Dictionary 1828

3. In gram., expressing nationality, local extraction, or place of abode; describing or designating a person as belonging to a certain race, country, district, town, or locality by birth or otherwise: as, a gentile noun (as Greek, Arab, Englishman, etc.); a gentile adjective (as Florentine, Spanish, etc.).
4. In gram. a noun or adjective derived from the name of a country or locality, and designating its natives or people: as the words Italian, American, Athenian, are gentiles.” — 1889 Century Dictionary

Pagan and heathen are primarily the same in meaning; but pagan is sometimes distinctively applied to those nations that, although worshiping false gods, are more cultivated, as the Greeks and Romans, and heathen to uncivilized idolaters, as the tribes of Africa. A Mohammedan is not counted a pagan, much less a heathen.” — 1889 Century Dictionary

PA’GANnoun [Latin paganus, a peasant or countryman, from pagus, a village.] A heathen; a Gentile; an idolater; one who worships false gods. This word was originally applied to the inhabitants of the country, who on the first propagation of the christian religion adhered to the worship of false gods, or refused to receive christianity, after it had been received by the inhabitants of the cities. In like manner, heathen signifies an inhabitant of the heath or woods, and caffer, in Arabic, signifies the inhabitant of a hut or cottage, and one that does not receive the religion of Mohammed. pagan is used to distinguish one from a Christian and a Mohammedan.” — Webster’s 1828 Dictionary

1. The body of persons who compose a community, town, city or nation.
2. The vulgar; the mass of illiterate persons.
3. A collection or community of animals.
4. The Gentiles.” — Webster’s 1828 Dictionary

גּוֹי gôwy, go’-ee; rarely (shortened) גֹּי gôy; apparently from the same root as H1465 (in the sense of massing); a foreign nation; hence, a Gentile; also (figuratively) a troop of animals, or a flight of locusts:—Gentile, heathen, nation, people.” — Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible

Goynation, people
NASB Translation
every nation (2), Gentiles (1), Goiim (1), Harosheth-hagoyim* (3), herds (1), nation (120), nations (425), people (4).” — NAS Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible 

The legal necessity of the surname is a product of the Beast System that is of Rome. Nations are shaped significantly, directly and indirectly, by the concepts of the pagan Roman law. These nations are gentile nations. Your person, in it’s required surname, is under the dominion of the Pope, and his Holy Roman Vatican Empire, who claims the temporal and spiritual sovereignty of all nations and “every human creature“. The antichrists are the Pope, the Jesuits, and all of the false teachers of Truth. Within the flattering titles of Rome, the Vatican, and the Pope contain the numerical value of 666. Even without applying gematria, one of the Pope’s titles is the Vicar of Christ [Vicarius Filii Dei – Vicar of The Son of God]. The term ‘vicar/vicarious [Vicarius]’ means “in place of” which is also a definition of the term ‘anti’. The Pope and the Jesuits are antichrists, for their corporate existence, teachings, and rhetoric are opposed to Christ, and evidently the papacy [the office of the Pope] is The Antichrist as foretold by Daniel, Paul, and John. All nations are matrixes of Rome, and these concepts are the foundation of the legal world which denotes the Beast System. The purpose of nations, including America, is to administrate and gain from human sin [Order Out Of Chaos], for breaking several of God’s commandments is required for participation. A spiritual man would never leave Nature and voluntarily alienate his adherence to God for the luxuries of civil society.

“All roads lead to Rome”

We are not isolated and we are not Christians on an individual basis, each one on his or her own, no, our Christian identity is to belong! We are Christians because we belong to the Church. It is like a last name: if the first name is “I am Christian”, the last name is “I belong to the Church”. —POPE FRANCIS, GENERAL AUDIENCE, St. Peter’s Square Wednesday, 25 June 2014

ANTICHRIST – Against Christ, or an opposition Christ, a rival Christ. The word is used only by the apostle John. Referring to False teachers, he says (1 John 2:18, 22; 4:3; 2 John 1:7), “Even now are there many antichrists.” (1.) This name has been applied to the “little horn” of the “king of fierce countenance” (Dan. 7:24, 25; 8:23-25). (2.) It has been applied also to the “false Christs” spoken of by our Lord (Matt. 24:5, 23, 24). (3.) To the “man of sin” described by Paul (2 Thess. 2:3, 4, 8-10). (4.) And to the “Beast of The Sea” (Rev. 13:1; 17:1-18). — Easton’s 1897 Bible Dictionary

ἀντίχριστος (antichrist),
“… The name ὁ ἀντίχριστος was formed perhaps by John, the only writer in the N. T. who uses it, [five times]; he employs it of the corrupt power and influence hostile to Christian interests, especially that which is at work in false teachers who have come from the bosom of the church and are engaged in disseminating error: 1 John 2:18 (where the meaning is, ‘what ye have heard concerning Antichrist, as about to make his appearance just before the return of Christ, is now fulfilled in the many false teachers, most worthy to be called antichrists,’ [on the omission of the article cf. Buttmann, 89 (78)]); 1 John 4:3; and of the false teachers themselves, 1 John 2:22″ — THAYER’S GREEK LEXICON, G500

Vicar of (Jesus) Christ [Latin, Vicarius Filii Dei],
a title assumed by the Pope with reference to his claim to stand in the place of Jesus Christ and possesses his authority in the church. — 1889 Century Dictionary

VICA’RIOUSadjective [Latin vicarius.]
2. Acting for another; filling the place of another; as a vicarious agent or officer.
3. Substituted in the place of another; as a vicarious sacrifice. The doctrine of vicarious punishment has occasioned much controversy. — 1828 Webster’s Dictionary

AN’TInoun [Gr. See Ante.]
A preposition signifying against, opposite, contrary, or in place of; used in many English words. — 1828 Webster’s Dictionary

“What the Seal of the United States of America represents, to anyone who takes it seriously, is a Ministry of Sin. A speech by Jesuit political scientist Michael Novak, published in the January 28, 1989 issue of America, the weekly magazine of American Jesuits, sums it up eloquently enough:
‘The framers wanted to build a “novus ordo” that would secure “liberty and justice for all”…. The underlying principle of this new order is the fact of human sin. To build a republic designed for sinners, then, is the indispensable task…. There is no use building a social system for saints. There are too few of them. And those there are are impossible to live with!… Any effective social system must therefore be designed for the only moral majority there is: sinners.’

The Latin historians Ovid , Pliny, and Aurelius Victor all tell us that the prehistoric name for Rome was Saturnia, “city of Saturn.” Saturnia’s original settlers came from the east, from Babylon. In the Babylonian (or Chaldean) language, according to Alexander Hislop, Saturnia was pronounced “Satr ” but spelled with only four characters, Stur. Now, Chaldean, like Hebrew, Greek, and to a limited extent Latin, had no separate numbering system. Their numbers were represented by certain characters of their alphabet. The cabalah derives its power from mathematical energies conveyed from these languages. Hislop reported a phenomenon that he said “every Chaldee scholar knows, ” which is that the letters of Stur, Rome’s earliest name, total 666:
S = 60; T = 400; U = 6; R = 200 := 666

Hislop further reported that Roman numerals consist of only six letters, D (500), C (100), L (50), X (10), V (5), and I (1 ) – we ignore the letter M, signifying 1,000, because it’s a latecomer, having evolved as shorthand for two D’s. When we total these six letters, we discover a startling link with the Beast of Revelation embedded in the very alphanumeric communication system of the Romans:
D= 500; C = 100; L = 50; X = 10; V = 5; I = 1 := 666” — Rulers of Evil: Useful Knowledge About Governing Bodies

Fifty Years in The Church of Rome, 1886, p. 372, 679, 681
Facing The Twentieth Century: Our Country, Its Power And Peril, 1899, p. 188-189
Popery. An Enemy to Civil and Religious Liberty; and Dangerous to Our Republic, 1836, p. 191

According to Trump the Constitution is of “very old and obsolete rules that we had to live with”.

The information presented is not intended to encourage terrorism or a disregard towards the law or government.

Earlier this year President Trump made some demeaning remarks about the Constitution when publicly announcing his declaration of another national emergency to ‘combat’ the coronavirus:

As the World Health Organization confirmed today, many of the things that — what we said were 100 percent correct, including our designation, before them, of Europe.  Like our earlier, very aggressive actions with China, this measure will save countless lives.  I appreciate a number of the folks behind me.  A number of the people behind me said that that saved a lot of lives, that early designation.

But it is only the beginning of what we’re really doing, and now we’re in a different phase.  We had some very old and obsolete rules [the Constitution] that we had to live with.  It worked under certain circumstances but not under mass circumstances.  They were there for a long time; they were in place for a long time.  And we’re breaking them down now.  And they’re very usable for certain instances, but not for this.

To unleash the full power of the federal government in this effort, today I am officially declaring a national emergency.  Two very big words.  The action I am taking will open up access to up to $50 billion of very importantly — very important and a large amount of money for states and territories and localities in our shared fight against this disease. —

This national emergency gives the president the ‘ability’ to execute orders in ways that could not be done by following the Constitution. It allows the government to disregard the Constitution when resolving said ’emergency’; the law of necessity.

Since 1933 the United States has been under constant states of national emergencies. Since then the private land holding families, in concordance with the Jesuit Vatican Empire, have chosen presidents who will continue this tradition until what was America is completely destroyed, enabling over 100 unconstitutional uniform laws and acts under this national emergency status.

Trump and close friend Hillary Clinton laughing it up with Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan [a “great friend” of Trump, and had “regularly reassigned priests who were accused of sexual molestation to new parishes and asked the Vatican permission to transfer $57 million to a trust fund to protect against court action“] at the 2016 Catholic Al Smith Dinner which is held for every presidential election.


Watch both Biden [Catholic, Jesuit coadjutor (* * *)] and Trump talk in favor of the Church [Jesuit Vatican Empire] at the 2020 Al Smith Dinner.


When Trump said, “We had some very old and obsolete rules [the Constitution] that we had to live with.” he wasn’t wrong. To the US citizen the Constitution is ultimately obsolete. So if you, as a US citizen, have been noticing the tyrannical actions of the government, and the loss of real liberty over the several decades, the national emergency is partially the reason. As a public US citizen— even before national emergencies, we have restricted constitutional rights because we surrendered them through the agencies of federal citizenship— you are subjected to these congressional approved unconstitutional doings of government. Don’t get your hopes up in the sense that we can somehow undo this. Every presidential candidate they push knows that the Constitution is not meant for the public despite their political rhetoric. The common people are constantly under attacks of mind control and propaganda, through education [training of animals] and media, which renders their perception in adherence to this artificial legal matrix beast system of control and deems it as a necessity. They will never see past this deception and continue to buy into the false flags and propaganda that will lead into the jesuitical NWO. They will continue to respect flattering titles and pursue mammon. They will continue to be surety to that which is not theirs [their person/citizenship is government property] and they will smart [suffer pains] for it.

Pro 11:15
He that is surety for a stranger shall smart for it: and he that hateth suretiship is sure. – The Bible KJV

Governments of artifice, flattering titles, and mammon—which is a non-self-existing artificial control construct created and ruled by man, not Nature— are a stranger to man, for man is of nature.

Homo vocabulum est naturae; persona juris civilis: Man (homo) is a term of nature; person (persona) of civil law. –

US Presidential Elections are a Sham

The information presented is not intended to encourage terrorism or a disregard towards the law or government.

sham: noun
1. To deceive; trick; cheat; delude with false pretenses.
7. Some device meant to give a thing a different outward appearance, as of neatness and finish, or to imitate something which it is not. – Century Dictionary

Yes, it is a sham. The media—mainstream news, alternative, and entertainment—are contrived into telling the common people to, “Make your voice heard” and that “Your vote matters”. We are encouraged by governments and corporations to vote for the US elections. Universities— who hire jesuitical, politically correct, and mostly left-leaning professors— encourage their students to participate in this american quadrennial ritual. Voting is referred to as “suffrage” which also means a prayer or petition to God in behalf of another; part of pleading in court involves “prayer” to the magistrate [a god].

suffrage: noun
2. The political right or act of voting; the exercise of the voting power in political affairs; especially, the right, under a representative government, of participating, directly or indirectly, in the choice of public officers and in the adoption or rejection of fundamental laws: usually with the definite article.
4. Eccles., an intercessory prayer or petition.
6. The prayers of the people in response to and as distinguished from the versicles or prayers said in litanies by the clergyman. – Century Dictionary

Participation in the suffrage is not a right, but is granted by a state on a consideration of that is most for the interest of the state… The grant of suffrage makes it a legal right until it is recalled and it is protected by the law as property is. – Black’s Law 4th

PRAY IN AID. In old English practice. To call upon for assistance. In real actions, the tenant might pray in aid or call for assistance of another, to help him to plead, because of the feebleness or imbecility of his own estate. – Black’s Law 4th

Prayer for relief [pray in aid] is a request or prayer made to the court. The term is usually shortened to prayer. A prayer is a part of a pleading, and it usually appears at the end of the pleading. It includes a request for specific relief or damages which the pleader deems himself entitled. –

Lets take a look on how the US presidential elections actually work.

The US does not have a direct election, but an indirect election where voters “pick the slate of electors instead of voting directly”, and consent to the States/electors who votes then elects the president.

When the voters of North Carolina voted this passed November they were actually voting to pick the slate of electors instead of voting directly for the president and the vice president.” – North Carolina Secretary of State Elaine Marshall at the 56th meeting of the North Carolina Electoral College
“… When you vote for a Presidential candidate, you aren’t actually voting for President. You are telling your State which candidate you want your State to vote for at the meeting of electors…”-

The electors are chosen by political parties of the State which are private corporations. Private corporations do not have to follow their own rules. The common people have no say in this but must be subjected to it when they vote for US president. Even with primaries and caucuses, a political party [private corporations] can choose whoever they want to be their presidential candidate. In 2016 supporters of socialist Bernie Sanders brought legal action against the DNC for rigging the primary elections in favor of Hilary Clinton for the democratic presidential candidate [* *]. They argued that “they were denied a fair and impartial election and had given money to a campaign on the belief that it was fair and impartial”, but the gods [court] countered the notion in favor of DNC lawyers citing the obvious, “the DNC is a private corporation; therefore, voters cannot protect their rights by turning to the courts.”. And in 2020, the DNC conspired with the RNC to rig the primaries in favor of child molester Joe Biden. Some people think that the 2008/2012 primaries were also rigged against Ron Paul. He even says the US elections are rigged. They are, but both he and Bernie Sanders knew they weren’t going to be chosen, and they are willing participants playing roles. The result of this charade is carefully orchestrated political theater to bring in the right person for the jesuitical NWO.

“Choosing each State’s electors is a two-part process. First, the political parties [private corporations] in each State choose slates of potential electors sometime before the general election. Second, during the general election, the voters in each State select their State’s electors by casting their ballots…. Political parties often choose individuals for the slate to recognize their service and dedication to that political party.” –

“A federal judge dismissed the DNC lawsuit on August 28. The court recognized that the DNC treated voters unfairly, but ruled that the DNC is a private corporation; therefore, voters cannot protect their rights by turning to the courts” –

Depending on the State the electors do not have to cast their electoral vote in accordance with the popular vote. In some States electors are bound by state law to cast their vote according to the popular vote. The other 21 States have no regulations preventing an elector to disregard the popular vote. When you vote you are actually selecting electors to possibly respect your choice for a national ruler. These 21 states can legally swing an election without any voting fraud.

There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their States. Some States, however, require electors to cast their votes according to the popular vote. These pledges fall into two categories—electors bound by State law and those bound by pledges to political parties.” –

There is no federal law that requires electors to vote as they have pledged, but 29 states and the District of Columbia have legal control over how their electors vote in the Electoral College. This means their electors are bound by state law and/or by state or party pledge to cast their vote for the candidate that wins the statewide popular vote. At the same time, this also means that there are 21 states in the union that have no requirements of, or legal control over, their electors. Therefore, despite the outcome of a state’s popular vote, the state’s electors are ultimately free to vote in whatever manner they please, including an abstention, with no legal repercussions.” –

Voter fraud and election rigging are part of the voting process as well. The first happens quite frequently when you consider the fact that not all of those operations are caught. As for the latter, political parties have conspired to control the outcome of primary elections [as stated earlier in this article], and the same can be done with presidential elections. Also, programs can be made to change election results. A computer programmer admitted to it under oath.

Even without voter fraud and election rigging, can the vote of the common citizens—subjects, denizens, serfs—really make a difference in the US indirect presidential elections when 21 states don’t regulate the elector’s adherence to the popular vote, especially when political parties can choose whoever they want to be their presidential candidate despite the support of the public majority—like they did with Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders? Ultimately, no. These political parties work for the private land holders—who never adapted to 14th amendment citizenship and kept their private status—to help choose rulers to administrate the public trespassers (public citizens). But don’t think these private land holders, who are also recognized in the constitution as a capitonym term “We the People…”, are the top of the pyramid of control because they’re still, and happily, adherent to the Holy See and are too subjects to the Roman Pontiff.

‘When in Rome, do as the romans do’. The US presidential electoral process is a copy of the Holy Roman Empire’s concept of electors. This is not surprising when considering that Washington DC used to be called Rome.

The founders [of America] appropriated the concept of electors from the Holy Roman Empire (962-1806). An elector was one of a number of princes of the various German states within the Holy Roman Empire who had a right to participate in the election of the German king (who generally was crowned as emperor). The term “college” (from the Latin collegium), refers to a body of people that acts as a unit, as in the college of cardinals who advise the pope and vote in papal elections.” –

When voting some countries have the option of “none of the above/NOTA” which the US does not have. The only way to apply this option in the US is if 100% of the citizens do not vote. I would say to just not participate in the US presidential election, but “He who is silent appears to consent.”, so we’re screwed either way. But hey, you get a neat “I Voted” sticker after your time in the voting booth so you can virtue signal that you prayed in a national petition to the temporal gods to select a ruler to govern your commercial life!