Allegiance is worship.

The information presented is not intended to encourage terrorism or a disregard towards the law or government.


Every citizen has allegiance to their nation. It is an innate condition of being a citizen. One with this status should comprehend that having allegiance to a nation is worshiping it as a god. The term god (lowercase) refers to a sovereign. This sovereign can be a pagan deity, or it can be a king, president, prime minister, prince, governor, landlord, magistrate; basically it is one who has prerogative over the subjects under him [a ruler]. If you consider having allegiance to a nation, you are actually following the ones who administer and control that nation, for a nation can not operate in self-existence. It needs men to provide agency to the administrative offices. Trusting in man [regardless of their condition] will always lead to destruction, but the men who have and are occupying these offices are of an esoteric sect. They are not common everyday people. They are ultimately satanic because they do not adhere to the message of Christ. They believe in their own idea of man’s self enlightenment. They are “humanitarians” and they proudly wear that title.

A citizen’s allegiance is duty to their government. This duty is to follow all the laws and codes [none of them being moral, but civil], and to be summoned on command. Duty is obedience/submission to superiors, and submission is to deliver yourself to the power of another. This submission is considered worship. To worship God or any other pagan god is to be obedient and to fully follow it’s laws, to deliver yourself to it. Worship is also defined as civil deference, and deference is submission. Being a citizen is submission to artifice [man’s law, legal fictions], and having your liberty being completely dominated [free-dom].

It doesn’t matter what YOU believe. If you are a citizen you are worshipping your nation. You are a gentile, a sinner, a transgressor, a worldling, a left-hand path taker, and maybe even a mammonist. You have denied following God’s Law through the example of Christ, and through temptations of civil luxury have chosen to follow man and his system of things [world of nations, legal world].

humanitarian – n. 1. One who affirms the humanity (but denies the divinity) of Christ. 2. One who professes the ‘Religion of Humanity’ holding that man’s duty is chiefly or wholly comprised in the advancement of the welfare of the human race: applied to varies schools of thought and practice.

adj. 1. Holding the views or doctrines of humanitarians; held or practiced by humanitarians. 2. Devoted to humanity or the human race as an object of worship.“— Random House Webster’s College Dictionary 1992

“Alle’giance. n.s. [ allegeance, Fr.] 1. The duty of subjects to the government.”

“Du’ty. n.s. [from due.] 3. Obedience or submission due to parents, governors, or superiours; loyalty; piety to parents.”

“Obe’dience. n.s. [ obedience, Fr. obedientia, Latin.] 1. Obsequiousness; submission to authority; compliance with command or prohibition.

“Submi’ssion. n.s. [ soumission, Fr. from submissus, Latin.] 1. Delivery of himself to the power of another.

Wo’rship. n.s. [weorðscype, Saxon.] 5. Honour; respect; civil deference.”

De’ference. n.s. [deference, French.] 3. Submission.”

“Wo’rldly. adj. [from world.] 1. Secular; relating to this life, in contradistinction to the life to come2. Bent upon this world; not attentive to a future state. 3. Human; common; belonging to the world [man’s system of things, legal world; not the Kingdom of God].”  Johnson, Samuel. A Dictionary of the English Language. 1755, 1773

worldling – A person whose soul is set upon gaining temporal possessions; one devoted to this world and its enjoyments.”— GNU version of the Collaborative International Dictionary of English

mammonist – One who is devoted to the acquisition of material wealth; one whose heart is set on riches above all else; a worldling. “— The Century Dictionary

“God – 3. god (B.) a ruler“— Chambers’s Twentieth Century Dictionary

“god – 3. A prince; a ruler; a magistrate or judge; an angel.”— Webster’s 1828

“gentile – One neither a Jew nor a Christian; a worshiper of false gods [pagan deities, rulers]; a heathen.”— Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary

“gentile:
3. In gram., expressing nationality, local extraction, or place of abode; describing or designating a person as belonging to a certain race, country, district, town, or locality by birth or otherwise: as, a gentile noun (as Greek, Arab, Englishman, etc.); a gentile adjective (as Florentine, Spanish, etc.).
4. In gram., a noun or adjective derived from the name of a country or locality, and designating its natives or people: as the words Italian, American, Athenian, are gentiles.”— 1889 Century Dictionary

Children are the greatest natural resource for secular pagan nations. ‘We are all jesuitical Catholics.’

The information presented is not intended to encourage terrorism or a disregard towards the law or government.


When one ponders what a nation’s greatest natural resource is they think along the terms of Nature’s bounty (i.e. water, minerals, timber, oil, etc.) It is openly admitted that people [mainly children] are a government’s greatest natural resource. To say that isn’t so obscure at first glance, but what does this actually mean behind the veil of fiction?

A government, and all of it’s inner workings, only exists on paper and in the imaginations of man. It cannot operate in it’s own self-existence, for it is a non-living artificial creation; it is lifeless [dead, a corpse]. It needs individuals to provide agency [breathe life] to the offices/entities in order for it to operate. A man in Reality is a product of nature, and it is he who provides his thoughts, energy, and actions, metaphorically being the source that powers the machine [the Beast System, civil life]; thus he is the State’s most dominant and necessary natural ‘re-source’. It is the civil ‘family’ unit [servants in a Roman household] that is essential to the “building clocks of society”, for they carry “the primary responsibility for the education [Common Core, low ranking, secular schooling] and socialization of children as well as instilling values of citizenship [civil life] and belonging in the society [vulgar ungodly masses, gentiles].” Therefore, it is necessary for the Beast System to indoctrinate children into adherence of this imaginative reality that is civil life. This is done through the process of education.

“CI’VIL.
adj. [civilis, Latin.]
6. Not natural; as, a person banished or outlawed is said to suffer civil, though not natural death.
12. Relating to the ancient consular or imperial government; as, civil law.”— Samuel Johnson’s 1755 Dictionary

“CIVIL, a.
1. Pertaining to the state in general; pertaining to organized society as represented by government.
2. Specifically, relating to the commonwealth as secularly organized for purposes of peace [uninterrupted commerce]
3. Reduced to order, rule, and government; not in a condition of anarchy; controlled by a regular administration; exhibiting some refinement of customs and manners; not savage or wild; civilized: as, civil life; civil society.”

“SECULAR, a. and n.
4. Of or pertaining to the things of time or of this world, and dissociated from or having no concern with religious, spiritual, or sacred matters or uses; connected with or relating to the world or its affairs; concerned with mundane or temporal matters; temporal; worldly; profane: as. secular affairs; the secular press; secular educationsecular music.
Synonyms Temporal, etc. see worldly.
noun l. A layman.”— Century Dictionary 1889

[‘civil’ is synonymous with ‘secular’]

Family obviously derives from the Latin word familia but the meaning of this word is not what one might expect. In Latin a famulus was a ‘domestic servant’; familia was a collective noun that denoted ‘all the servants in a Roman household’. When the word was borrowed into Middle English as familie around the turn of the fifteenth century, it was with this original meaning. This sense persisted until the nineteenth century and was variously extended to include the retinue of a nobleman or the staff of a high-ranking military officer.”— Dictionary Of Word Origins, Linda and Roger Flavell

You put your kids into school where they sit in a class using pencils while being educated in government regulated common-core curriculums so they can become smart and possibly attend a prestigious university to obtain a degree, becoming a scholar, in hopes of landing a well paying job. “Control language and you control the masses!” It is no coincidence that the words we commonly use have underlying nefarious meanings.

Civil ‘education’ is etymologically akin to the act of taming wild animals and training for work. It is the breaking of the Nature of man to introduce civility with the intended result not of a moral man, but of a good citizen. As man’s maxim of law states, “A man may obey the law and yet be neither honest nor a good neighbor.” The elites define a natural man as an idiot/fool because he is not lettered or accustomed to civility. Idiot originally meant private as in separate and foreign from the public civil. The natural man is of nature [man], not yet domesticated into man’s system of things [per-son, hu-man]. Man’s system of things, although belonging to man, is a stranger to the natural man, therefore he must be trained, broken [like “breaking a horse”], into society. This is mostly achieved through registering [a deliverance to a sovereign’s ownership] a child into the guardianship of public schooling where the goal is “enforcement of the minimum standards of education thought necessary for an informed and useful citizenry. In sheer economic terms, the nation’s children are a natural resource, which the state may legitimately exploit to its full potential by means of compulsory education.” Through civil education your child becomes the State’s greatest natural resource.

“education (n.)
1530s, “child-rearing,” also “the training of animals,” from French education (14c.) and directly from Latin educationem (nominative educatio) “a rearing, training,” noun of action from past-participle stem of educare (see educate). Originally of instruction in social codes and manners; meaning “systematic schooling and training for work” is from 1610s.
All education is despotism. [William Godwin, “Enquirer,” 1797]”— https://www.etymonline.com/word/education#etymonline_v_29710

“Recognizing that children are the Commonwealth’s greatest natural resource…”— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 194A.010

“Thus from its inception this country has placed its faith in public education as a means of insuring the development, improvement and preservation of the social fabric. In Brown v. Board of Education the Supreme Court, in holding that separate facilities for the races are inherently unequal, recognized this deep commitment to public education:

‘Today, education is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments. Compulsory school attendance laws and the great expenditures for education both demonstrate our recognition of the importance of education to our democratic society. It is required in the performance of our most basic public responsibilities, even service in the armed forces. It is the very foundation of good citizenship. Today it is a principal instrument in awakening the child to cultural values, in preparing him for later professional training, and in helping him to adjust normally to his environment. In these days, it is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life if he is denied the opportunity of an education. Such an opportunity, where the state has undertaken to provide it, is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms.’

Clearly the state has a valid interest in compulsory education: the goal is not the standardization of the nation’s youth but enforcement of the minimum standards of education thought necessary for an informed and useful citizenry. In sheer economic terms, the nation’s children are a natural resource, which the state may legitimately exploit to its full potential by means of compulsory education. But there is a countervailing, though largely undefined, policy of pluralism and deference to minority ethnic groups that supports the Amish refusal to be modern men.”— THE PAST AS PRESENT: SELECTED THOUGHTS & ESSAYS by Paul T. Ruxin, The Right Not to Be Modern Men: The Amish and Compulsory Education

resource (n.)
1610s, “any means of supplying a want or deficiency,” from French resourse “a source, a spring,” noun use of fem. past participle of Old French resourdre “to rally, raise again,” from Latin resurgere “rise again” (see resurgent).

The meaning “possibility of aid or assistance” (often with a negative) is by 1690s; the meaning “expedient, device, shift” also is from 1690s. Resources as “a country’s wealth, means of raising money and supplies” is recorded by 1779. A library resource center was so called by 1968.”— https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=resource

“re-
prefix
1. Again; anew: rebuild.
2. Backward; back: react.
3. Used as an intensive: refine.“— American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 5th

“SOURCE, noun [Latin surgo.]
1. Properly, the spring or fountain [persons] from which a stream of water [commerce] proceeds, or any collection of water within the earth or upon its surface, in which a stream originates…
2. First cause; original; that which gives rise to any thing. Thus ambition, the love of power and of fame, have been the sources of half the calamities of nations. Intemperance is the source of innumerable evils to individuals.”— Webster’s 1828

We refer to our young offspring as kids, and most of us know the term kid used to mean a young goat, but it is also connected to the word ‘heathen’. There is a nefarious reason why we’ve been made to use that term for our offspring. In Matthew 25:31-46 a parable is made about Followers [sheep] and unbelievers [goats] when Christ reigns on earth. The sheep are on the right handed less travelled path and are accepted into God’s Kingdom, whereas the goats have taken the wide and heavily tracked left handed path and are inevitably lead into irredeemable separation from God. In the Jewish Day Of Atonement they would take two goats and imaginatively place sins on one (To Azazel) and ordained the other as pure and innocent (To The Lord). They both were killed/sacrificed as commanded by God [the Jews either misinterpreted God’s word, or they were actually bewitched by Satan posing as God]. The one who was “To The Lord” was sacrificed, and the other “To Azazel” was sent out into the wilderness/desert and pushed over a cliff falling to it’s death. Ancient and modern pagans sacrifice goats for their pseudo-spiritual rituals. In the Hindu sacrificial ceremony of Deopokhari, a young goat is taken and thrown into a pond where a group of men torture and rip apart it’s limbs for about 40 minutes or until the goat dies. This is to appease their goddess, “stemmed from a legend involving gods from medieval times who would drown children in the town pond.” Modern culture, controlled by the satanic saturnian elite, has made us refer to our young offspring as ‘kids’. A kid was always known as a young goat until the 1800s. When you refer to your young offspring as kids the powers that be interpret it as animals eligible for sacrifice. This is because you have delivered your children into a lifelong obligation of being administered by devils. You have casted them out into the ‘desert’, a cursed place devoid of God’s blessing; secular nations. Another word for professionals of the law, lawyers and barristers, are ‘devils.’ Even in modern times, the barristers of the U.K. proudly call themselves devils and ‘devilmasters.’ It is lawyers who cunningly draft up these ungodly laws and codes we are subjected to follow. In early American history lawyers were abhorred, and in some places they were prohibited from practicing law.

“KID, noun [Latin hoedus; vulgar.]
1. A young goat.
2. A faggot; a bundle of heath and furze.”— Webster’s 1828

“heathen
Old English hæðen “not Christian or Jewish,” also as a noun, “heathen man, one of a race or nation which does not acknowledge the God of the Bible“…
Perhaps literally “dweller on the heath, one inhabiting uncultivated land;” see heath + -en…”— https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=heathen

Desert: (midbar, arabah)
(5.) This word is the symbol of the Jewish church when they had forsaken God (Isa 40:3). Nations destitute of the knowledge of God are called a “wilderness” (32:15, midbar). It is a symbol of temptation, solitude, and persecution (Isa 27:10, midbar; 33:9, arabah).“— Easton’s Bible Dictionary

lawyer, n. jurist; legal adviser; district or prosecuting attorney, attorney general, prosecutor; advocate, barrister, solicitor, counsel, counselor (-at-law); King’s or Queen’s counsel; attorney (-at-law); bencher; bar; pleader; Portia; a Daniel come to judgment; judge advocate; devil’s advocate; pettifogger, shyster. Colloq., D.A.; ambulance chaser; sea lawyer. Slang, mouthpiece, lip.”— The New American Roget’s College Thesaurus In Dictionary Form, 1962

“probatio diabolica [Latin “devil’s proof”] Civil law. The (usu. difficult) proof of ownership of an immovable thing by tracing its title back to the sovereign.”

deviling (dev-d-ling). 1. The act of a barrister’s handing a brief over to another to handle a case. 2. The practice of a junior barrister (known as a “devil”) who drafts pleadings or other documents for a senior barrister [devilmaster] who approves them, signs them, and is ultimately responsible for the work. – Also spelled devilling.“— Black’s Law 8th

“The [Plymouth] colony’s first trained lawyer, Thomas Lechford, did little to instill enthusiasm. He was disbarred for trying to influence a jury. Antilawyer sentiment was pervasive elsewhere as well, and the ‘ancient English prejudice against lawyers secured new strength in America.’ The framers of the Fundamental Constitutions of the Carolinas in 1669 declared it a ‘base and vile thing to plead for money or reward.’ Connecticut and Virginia during a portion of the seventeenth century prohibited lawyers from practicing.”— The Magic Mirror: Law In American History

The root word for ‘school’ is scheme which leads to a secret or devious plan, and also shape, form, appearance. It is a devious plot to shape the child with the appearance of civil personhood in it’s innate form of secular servitude to provide source for the artificial world of human control [civil society]. Anyone can see the relation with the design of civil schools being similar to that of prisons, but this is not a coincidence. Public schools were designed intentionally by the same architects who designed prisons. Architect Frank Locker from Harvard University said in an interview with the Colombian newspaper El Tiempo, “In the US, many of the same people who designed prisons also designed schools. What comes to mind when you see a long hall of closed doors, that you can’t be in without permission, and a bell that tells you when to come in, when to leave, when class starts, when it ends? What does that look like to you?” This is to subconsciously acclimate the child’s mind into the open-air debtors prison [hell] that is civil society. In law ‘hell’ is the “place under the exchequer chamber, where the king’s debtors were confined.” Our citizenship relation to our secular nation is of eternal debtorship, for in it we always owe civil obligations, and we are under the executive jurisdictional branch where we are confined. Public and private civil schooling resembles the Catholic school in it’s basic design indoctrinating dogmatic fear and obedience to authority. What is taught according to the curriculum is fact. What was once white is now black, and what was once sweet is now bitter. Case closed. We are all jesuitical Catholics now as it will be more apparent later in this article.

“SCHOOL, believe it or not, originally meant leisure, spare time, ease. It comes from the Greek skhole, which is also the root of scheme.”— Twenty-Five Curious Word Origins, The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 50, No. 6 (Feb., 1969)

“SCHOOL, noun [Latin schola; Gr. leisure, vacation from business, lucubration at leisure, a place where leisure is enjoyed, a school The adverb signifies at ease, leisurely, slowly, hardly, with labor or difficulty. I think, must have been derived from the Latin. This word seems originally to have denoted leisure, freedom from business, a time given to sports, games or exercises, and afterwards time given to literary studies. the sense of a crowd, collection or shoal, seems to be derivative.]”— Webster’s 1828

“school (n.)
… ” from Greek skhole “spare time, leisure, rest, ease; idleness; that in which leisure is employed; learned discussion;” also “a place for lectures, school;” originally “a holding back, a keeping clear,” from skhein “to get” (from PIE root *segh- “to hold“) + -ole by analogy with bole “a throw,” stole “outfit,” etc.

… Translated in Old English as larhus, literally “lore house,” but this seems to have been a glossary word only.”— https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=school

“scheme
noun A secret or devious plan; a plot.”— The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition

“scheme (n.)
1550s, “figure of speech,” from Medieval Latin schema “shape, figure, form, appearance; figure of speech; posture in dancing,” from Greek skhema (genitive skhematos) “figure, appearance, the nature of a thing,” related to skhein “to get,” and ekhein “to have, hold; be in a given state or condition,” from PIE root *segh- “to hold.”

The sense “program of action” first is attested 1640s. Unfavorable overtones (selfish, devious) began to creep in early 18c.”— https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=scheme

“HELL. The name formerly given to a place under the exchequer chamber, where the king’s debtors were confined.”— Black’s Law 4th

It’s class time which starts with the ‘pedagogue’ taking roll-call to account how many ships are present! Pedagogue is another word for an educator teaching in a dogmatic manner, derived from Greek paidagogos which referred to a slave in charge of children. The word ‘class’ was first used by the ancient pagan romans meaning army/fleet referring to a group of ships or persons under arms. It was also an order to divide the romans for taxation. This is fitting in our modern usage of it, for the purpose of public and private school classes is to teach the child just enough to stay afloat in their taxed citizen-ships, bearing the Arms of their secular nation, when they utilize or sign for their government issued [G.I.] per-son at/after the age of legal accountability. ‘Roll-calling’ comes from the military as a signal given by a drum, trumpet, or other musical instrument for soldiers to attend the accounting of who was present. In the 14th century the word ‘roll’ referred to a register. Your child must be registered [abandoned to the king] into the public to be accepted into public school. As a verb it meant to cover, wrap, or enclose; symbolic to civil education placing veils over their eyes and ears so they cannot see nor hear Truth.

“PEDAGOGUE,
1. A schoolteacher; an educator.
2.One who instructs in a pedantic or dogmatic manner.“— The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition

“PEDAGOGUE originally meant a slave in charge of children. It comes from the Greek paidagogos and is etymologically related to agent [servant/slave].

“CLASS has its origin in classis, the Latin word for fleet. At first the Romans applied the word to a group of ships only, but gradually they extended its application to a group of people, and this meaning has come down to our times.”— Twenty-Five Curious Word Origins, The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 50, No. 6 (Feb., 1969)

“class (n.)
… from Latin classis “a class, a division; army, fleet,” especially “any one of the six orders into which Servius Tullius divided the Roman people for the purpose of taxation;” traditionally originally “the people of Rome under arms” (a sense attested in English from 1650s), and thus akin to calare “to call (to arms),” from PIE root *kele- (2) “to shout.” In early use in English also in Latin form classis.”— https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=class

One cannot have class without utilizing pencils! The powers that be have a sick sense of humor. To them a ‘pencil’ is a phallic symbol. They decided to use the ancient roman slang term for a paintbrush, which is penicillum— a diminutive form of the word for penis, referring to a lead based wooden writing utensil. This isn’t surprising when you consider the fact that the elites esoterically idolize the phallus, preferably erected ones which the obelisk symbolizes. The general design of a pencil is intentionally shaped in similar fashion to that of an obelisk. The obelisk has been placed in many municipalities worldwide, and like a dog pissing to mark his territory the elites like to erect this column to mark their satanic sovereignty being divinely ordained to administrate the ungodly masses. In writing and grammar, an ‘obelisk’ is “a mark of censure in the margin of a book, in the form of a dagger [†].” A ‘censure’ is a blame, a judgement, and “a spiritual punishment inflicted by some ecclesiastical judge.” We are being spiritually punished for putting gods before Yehovah, and the obelisk structure is a mark which represents that. The powers that be hold multiple meanings for each of their symbols. To their phallic symbol they attribute flattering, man-occulted, humanist, pagan-spiritual concepts for the appearance of sacred truth and importance, but underneath the veil is just homoerotic satanic deviance. These flattering pseudo-spiritual [catholic, new age, pagan] concepts range from signifying St. Michael and his angels, resurrection, restored order/birth of a new age, Earth’s polar shift, sun worship, male/solar energy, etc. Obelisks supposedly originated in ancient Egypt for sun worship, but the idea of it being phallic shaped specifically comes from the legend of the Osirian Cycle—

“… monolith, obelisk and stone. All of these are significant symbols in the ancient Mystery Religions. And you saw that this was not God, because creation had already taken place. The world had been created, plants and animals had been created, and primitive man existed on the earth before this monolith, this obelisk, this stone ever made its appearance. It is also known as, the stone that you saw earlier, the generative force or the penis.

Osiris [sun-god] was chopped into fourteen pieces. Isis came to put him back together again and bring him to life. She could find all the pieces except one, the phallus… It is the penis of Osiris, the generative force… it represents the Luciferian philosophy.

The Egyptian allegory tells us that the phallus of Osiris was swallowed by a fish. This is most significant and we may even infer mankind itself is the fish…But it even goes any further, for this age has been known as the age of Pisces, the fish. The significant force and the power in the age Pisces was Christianity.

the phallus being the symbol of the vital power of the Mystery School and so used in Egyptian hieroglyphics. The phallus, then, is the Lost Word which is not discovered but for which a golden replica is substituted. In the Egyptian hieroglyphics the physical body, after the death of the soul or its departure therefrom, is called the khat [or K‐H‐A‐T], and the hieroglyphic for this is a fish.

In Dealey Plaza, you will find an obelisk. In Washington D.C., you will find obelisk, known as the Washington Monument. In the courtyard of the Vatican, you will find an obelisk. Should I continue? The family in England, whose estates are called Syon House, has an obelisk on their lawns.”— William Cooper, Mystery Babylon Series, 1993

The ancient Egyptian ‘Luxor Obelisk’ in Paris wearing a giant pink condom to advertise World Aids Day

“PENCIL derives in a roundabout way from penis. The Romans humorously called a painters brush a penicillum, a diminutive form of the word for the male organ of generation, and penicillum became the Old French pincel, from which we have our modern pencil.”— Twenty-Five Curious Word Origins, The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 50, No. 6 (Feb., 1969)

“OB’ELISK, noun [Latin obeliscus; Gr. a spit.]
1. A truncated, quadrangular and slender pyramid intended as an ornament, and often charged with inscriptions or hieroglyphics. Some ancient obelisks appear to have been erected in honor of distinguished persons or their achievements. Ptolemy Philadelphus raised one of 88 cubits high in honor of Arsinee. Augustus erected one in the Campus Martius at Rome, which served to mark the hours on a horizontal dial drawn on the pavement.“— Webster’s 1828

“O’belisk.
n.s. [ obeliscus, Latin.]
2. A mark of censure in the margin of a book, in the form of a dagger [†].

CE’NSURE.
n.s. [censura, Latin.]
1. Blame; reprimand; reproach.
2. Judgment; opinion.
3. Judicial sentence.
4. A spiritual punishment inflicted by some ecclesiastical judge.“— Samuel Johnson’s 1755 Dictionary

Subjecting your child to Common Core curriculums molds him into a vulgar [unlettered] commoner. Hence the name. The term ‘vulgar’ means common, low-bred, illiterate. In some passages in the Bible ‘common’ refers to the public/that which belongs to the state, or defiled, unclean, unholy; i. e., “… God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean.” The word ‘curriculum’ derives from the Latin term ‘currere’ which means to run, and those with eyes to see have called educational curriculums a ‘runaround’ which means a deception. Children are being deceived into thinking they’re getting a Real education, when they are receiving a vulgar, secular, civil, commoner/low-ranking one. One thing is for sure; this curriculum makes them ‘smart’ [suffer pains, punished]. Common Core is not a federal legislation [it’s unconstitutional], yet it is enacted individually by all 50 States. Some may think they can just put their child into a private school to avoid it, but all institutions of higher education require students to have an acceptable score on tests that require Common Core, making the private schools teach it. So why do all 50 States follow suite to establish Common Core curriculums? Because the governors of the 50 States are in conspiracy to indoctrinate this vulgar curriculum onto the children to make them useful natural resources for the papal Green NWO [Agenda 21/30, “The Great Reset”]. These governors make up the membership of the National Governor’s Association, and with the CCSSO, and ADL, they scheme up Common Core curriculums/runarounds to sell to their own States. They then return from DC to their States dressing themselves in the office of governor to accept these curriculums. This documentary exposes this scheme. The lessons that come from this constantly altered and updated curriculum are ungodly, of humanism and scientism. It’s level of education is much lower than before States required certain educational standards. As quoted earlier in this article, the reason for such low education standards is it to create a vulgarly “informed and useful citizenry.” The Natural obligation of parents are to teach their own children the things required for Life. But we have been accustomed to abandoning this Natural duty to make it a money gaining endeavor for a stranger who will teach whatever is thrown at him by his satanic civil administrators. These strangers do not teach the things of Life, but the things of civil life rendering your child as the State’s greatest natural resource.

“VULGAR,
1. Of or pertaining to the common people; suited to or practised among the multitude; plebeian: as, vulgar life; vulgar sports.
2. Common; in general use; customary; usual; ordinary.
3. Hence, national; vernacular: as, the vulgar tongue; the vulgar version of the Scriptures;…
3. Pertaining or belonging to the lower or less refined class of people: unrefined; hence, coarse; offensive to good taste; rude; boorish; low; mean; base: as, vulgar men, language, minds, or manners.
4. Rustic, low-bred.
5. noun A vulgar person; one of the common people: used only in the plural.
6. noun The vernacular tongue or common language of a country.”— Century Dictionary 1889

κοινός koinós, koy-nos’; probably from G4862; common, i.e. (literally) shared by all or several, or (ceremonially) profane:—common, defiled, unclean, unholy.“— Thayer’s Greek Lexicon

PEOPLE, noun [Latin populus]
2. The vulgar; the mass of illiterate persons.
6. A collection or community of animals.
9. The Gentiles.”— Webster’s 1828

“curriculum (n.)
a course, especially a fixed course of study at a college, university, or school,” 1824, from a Modern Latin transferred use of classical Latin curriculum “a running, course, career” (also “a fast chariot, racing car”), from currere “to run” (from PIE root *kers- “to run”). Used in English as a Latin word since 1630s at Scottish universities.”— https://www.etymonline.com/word/curriculum#etymonline_v_489

“CURRICULUM originally meant a race course, from Latin currere, to run, and there are still many today who believe, with good reason, that a curriculum is a run around.”— Twenty-Five Curious Word Origins, The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 50, No. 6 (Feb., 1969)

“runaround – 1. Deception, usually in the form of evasive excuses.”— The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.

“SM’ART, noun [This word is probably formed on the root of Latin amarus, bitter, that is, sharp.]
2. Severe pungent pain of mind; pungent grief; as the smart of affliction.
verb intransitive
2. To feel a pungent pain of mind; to feel sharp pain; as, to smart under sufferings.
3. To be punished; to bear penalties or the evil consequences of any thing. He that is surety for a stranger shall smart for it. Proverbs 11:15.— Webster’s 1828

After your child has proven to be vulgar enough to become a student of the “higher” learning institutions, he now has a chance at obtaining additional flattering titles to his person, which in theory can aid in his chances of being employed [used] as a ‘hireling’ [serve for wages; prostitute] in a ‘job’ [low mean lucrative busy affair, a stabbing] of higher income. If he attends a ‘prestigious university’ you, as a parent, now have bragging rights to boast to your friends and family that your parenting skills ‘converted’ your child into Catholic schemery! The term ‘prestigious’ means practicing trickery; an underhand scheme. To trick is to live by fraud, so a prestigious university prepares one to be an eligible hireling in a fraudulent world ran by fiction. University comes from the term ‘universe’ which leads to the word ‘catholic’ with it’s etymology and definition being the universe/universal. Not so coincidentally, ‘catholic’ also means not bigoted; liberal, which is the face of nearly all colleges and universities. The first universities were officially established with their charters granted by the papacy. The pope also designed it’s fundamentals and applications, many of which still applies to our modern universities and colleges, such as the ranking system of students: freshman [a new convert], sophomore [a wise fool], junior [puny, low rank, unskilled], senior [priest]. Later the Jesuits took initiative and established many universities across Europe, Asia, and the Americas in accordance with the humanist papal design. Today all universities and colleges are matrixes of Catholic higher learning [“learning against learning”] institutions. We are all jesuitical Catholics now! Putting your child into one of these can benefit him in the secular world ruled by Satan. He may be able to add “Dr.” or “Phd” to his person’s name, which is pretty flattering. Then he can land a job that adds another flattering title. Depending on his ‘degree’ [of crime], when concerning his field of study he becomes an authoritative voice even if he is wrong, for the layman is unlettered and “doesn’t has the time to research.” His college degree is of crime, for he must transgress on Nature’s Law [the message of Christ] to have the worldly membership required for admission, and this degree qualifies him as a higher raking prostitute [hireling], therefore he can have a less stressful time selling himself for the pursuit of mammon. He will walk about in pride with his flattering titles believing he is some-thing when he is no-thing. He will spend his life ‘making a living’ in a fictional world instead of just living.

“Hi’reling.
n.s. [from hire.]
1. One who serves for wages.
2. A mercenary; a prostitute.
adj.
1. Serving for hire; venal; mercenary; doing what is done for money.”

“JOB.
n.s. [A low word now much in use, of which I cannot tell the etymology.]
1. A low mean lucrative busy affair.
2.Petty, piddling work; a piece of chance work.
3. A sudden stab with a sharp instrument.”— Samuel Johnson’s 1755 Dictionary

“PRESTIG’IOUS, adjective Practicing tricks; juggling.

TRICK, noun 
1. An artifice or stratagem for the purpose of deception; a fraudful contrivance for an evil purpose, or an underhand scheme to impose upon the world; a cheat or cheating.“— Webster’s 1828

“To Trick.
v.n.
1. To live by fraud.“— Samuel Johnson’s 1755 Dictionary

“CATHOLIC, a. and n. … < L. catholicus, universal, general (neut. pl. catholica, all things together, the universe), in LL. and ML. esp. eccles., general, common
1. Universal; embracing all; wide-extending
2. Not narrow-minded, partial, or bigoted [a term used mainly by leftists, socialists, and communists (which are Jesuitical political ideologies) towards those who do not adhere to their Jesuitical fiction]; free from prejudice; liberal [a common concern is that colleges and universities are “too liberal”]; possessing a mind that appreciates all truth [humanist, secular “truths”], or a spirit that appreciates all that is good [as according to the papacy].

“UNIVERSITY, n. … < L. universita(t-)s, the whole, the universe, LL. a society, company, corporation, gild, ML. a university, < universus, all together, whole, entire, collective, general: see universe.]
1. The whole, the universe.
2. A corporation; a gild.
3. An association of men for the purpose of study, which confers degrees which are acknowledged as valid throughout Christendom [The Church, what the Vatican sanctions as “Christian/ity”], is endowed, and is privileged by the state in order that the people may receive intellectual guidance, and that the theoretical problems which present themselves in the development of civilization may be resolved [through Catholic, Jesuit, liberal, humanist learning].”— Century Dictionary 1889

“freshman (n.)
1550s, “newcomer, novice,” from fresh (adj.1) in the sense “making one’s first acquaintance, inexperienced” + man (n.)…”

“newcomer (n.)
“recent arrival, a stranger newly arrived,”… Old English also used niwcumen as a noun meaning “newcomer, neophyte.”

“neophyte (n.)
c. 1400, neophite, “new convert” (modern spelling from 16c.), from Church Latin neophytus, from Greek neophytos “a new convert; one newly initiated,” noun use of adjective meaning “newly initiated, newly converted,”…”

novice (n.)
mid-14c., “probationer in a religious order,”… noun use of Latin novicius “newly imported, newly arrived, inexperienced” (of slaves)…”— https://www.etymonline.com/

“SOPHOMORE or “wise fool” is an invented word which is supposed to be a combination of two Greek words, sophos, wise, and moros, foolish. It was probably invented in imitation of sophister, the designation given to a student in his second or third year at Trinity College, Dublin, or Cambridge University.”— Twenty-Five Curious Word Origins, The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 50, No. 6 (Feb., 1969)

“puny (adj.)
1570s, “inferior in rank” (1540s as a noun, “junior pupil, freshman“)”— https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=puny

“Puisne (… from late Latin post-, “after”, and natus, “born”) is a legal term of art obsolete in many jurisdictions and, when current, used mainly in British English meaning “inferior in rank”https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puisne

“SENIOR, adjective see’nyor. [Latin seniorcomparative of senex, old.] Elder or older; but as an adjective, it usually signifies older in office; as the senior pastor of a church,..”— Webster’s 1828

“Priest. —This word (etymologically “elder”, from Greek: presbuteros, presbyter) has taken the meaning of “sacerdos”, from which no substantive has been formed in various modern languages (English, French, German)…”— https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/priest

We are all Catholics now!“— Mike Huckabee CPAC Speech, 2/10/2012

We are all Jesuits.” ―Herman A. Van Rompuy: President of the European Union, addressing European leaders, in Florence, Italy: Sep. 7, 2012

“The term “degree” denotes a division or classification of one specific crime into several grades or stadia of guilt, according to the circumstances attending its commission. Thus, in some states, there may be “murder in the second degree.”— Black’s Law 4th

One can scoff at the information presented here as writings from a crazy rambling conspiracist. The rulers of this world do not care what you believe as long as you are reliant on their social control systems. As long as you are using their property [i.e. your G.I. legal entity per-son, surname, citizenship, public] you become their prerogative and they have complete control over you. Those who have the eyes can see the absolute wickedness of the system converting man into hu-man [belonging to man, not God] through civil education. Taking the kid away from God’s Kingdom [the Natural] and casting him out to the desert [secular nations] to be spiritually killed is a necessity to the Beast System, for that which belongs to God is to be rendered unto Him, and that which belongs to Caesar is his prerogative [Mar 12:17]. They must turn us into hu-mans, into their property [their per-sons], so we can become their greatest natural resource.

Wickedness of govern-ment

The information presented is not intended to encourage terrorism or a disregard towards the law or government.


Here is just one example of absolute evil and the inversion of Reality within the legal realm; man’s law, Satan’s world, hell.

In setting up a fiction, the law requires us to take an actual situation and imagine it to be different from what it really is, either by thinking of nonexistent elements as added to it or by thinking of existing elements as removed from it, so as to permit the application of legal maxims which refer only to the situation as thus transformed. Its purpose in doing this is to make it possible to decide cases according to analogy when a direct ruling does not apply. The whole nature of legal fictions is determined by this purpose, and they are sustained only so far as it requires. The legislator and the judge always remain aware that the fictitious situation does not correspond to reality. So it is also with the so-called dogmatic fiction that is employed in jurisprudence to permit legal facts to be systematically classified and related to each other. Here again, the situation is thought of as existing, but it is not assumed to exist.“— The Theory Of Money And Credit by LUDWIG VON MISES

“legal fiction
nsomething asssumed in law to be fact irrespective of the truth or accuracy of that assumption.”— Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law, 1996

“legal fiction:
a rule assuming as true something that is clearly false. A fiction is often used to get around the provisions of constitutions and legal codes that legislators are hesitant to change or to encumber with specific limitations. Thus, when a legislature has no legal power to sit beyond a certain midnight but has five hours more of work still to do, it is easier to turn back the official clock from time to time than it is to change the law or constitution.

In ancient Rome, where every family needed a male heir, the lack of one was overcome through the legal fiction of adoption. In England, when courts handling civil cases were full, the Court of Queen’s (or King’s) Bench, a criminal court, could take some of the load by pretending that the defendant in a simple civil suit had been arrested and was in custody.

Almost any legal fiction can be stated in terms of fact. Thus, the fiction that a corporation is, for many purposes, a person separate from its members is equivalent to saying that, for those purposes, the law deals with the group as a unit, disregarding for the moment the group’s individual members as such.”— Universalium, 2010

“Res judicata facit ex albo nigrum, ex nigro album, ex curvo rectum, ex recto curvum. A thing adjudged makes what was white, black; what was black, white; what was crooked straight; what was straight, crooked.” — Bouvier’s Law Dictionary Adapted To The Constitution of the United States, 1856

Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness;
Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!
“— Isa 5:20

Legal maxims are essentially foundational rules the magi-strates and legislators follow when administrating their artifice. This Beast System needs wickedness to live, for if they are made to adhere to actual Truths of Reality, instead of playing pretend adhering to fictions and artifice, the legitimacy of its sorcery would dwindle and fail.

Welcome to the ‘baly’. I hope you like enduring ‘danger’.

“BALY.
(1) Evil; sorrow.
(4) Dominion; government.”

“DANGERE.
(1) Lordship, or dominion; the power which the feudal lord has over his vassals.”— A Dictionary of Archaic and Provincial Words: Obsolete Phrases, Proverbs, and Ancient Customs, from the XIV Century, 1904

“danger (n.)
mid-13c., daunger, “arrogance, insolence;” c. 1300, “power of a lord or master, jurisdiction,” from Anglo-French daunger, Old French dangier “power, power to harm, mastery, authority, control” (12c., Modern French danger), alteration (due to association with damnum) of dongier, from Vulgar Latin *dominarium “power of a lord,” from Latin dominus “lord, master,” from domus “house” (from PIE root *dem- “house, household”).”— https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=danger

“VASSAL
2. A subject; a dependent.”— Webster’s 1828 Dictionary
[Citizens are considered subjects. The term “nationals” is now used in place of “subjects” according to American Law and Procedure: Constitutional Law Vol. 12]

“… it is to be noticed that the term subject is capable of a different and wider application, in which it includes all members of the body politic, whether they are citizens (i.e., subjects stricto sensu) or resident aliens. All such persons are subjects, all being subject to the power of the state and to its jurisdiction, and as owing to it, at least temporarily, fidelity and obedience.”— Black’s Law 9th

“MAGISTRATE
A public civil officer, invested with the executive government or some branch of it. In this sense, a king is the highest or first magistrate as is the President of the United States. But the word is more particularly applied to subordinate officers, as governors, intendants, prefects, mayors, justices of the peace, and the like.”— Webster’s 1828 Dictionary

Your last name is a flattering title under the Beast System.

The information presented is not intended to encourage terrorism or a disregard towards the law or government.


A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles – Founded Mainly on the Materials Collected by the Philological Society (1888), Jonathan Swift – Th. on Var. Subj. (1706),
When a man is made a spiritual peer he loses his sir-name; when a temporal, his christian-name.

We have become so acquainted with our surname that “we commonly think no more of them than we do of our noses, or the length of our feet.” Most people see it as a natural concept and even have pride for their surname. In the vernacular, a person’s last name, or surname, is an additional name placed after his first name [Christian name, God-given name] to help identify the individual. The beginning use of it in history was correlated with their family/tribe, as in Son of Nun, or local/place-name, as in Simon the Canaanite; to distinguish from those with the same first name. Soon after the first century A.D. the use of permanent patronyms [“William’s John” or “John-William’s-son”/Williamson] begins to become a necessity for certain legal enactments. Later, nations sanction surnames for the rights, privileges, and subjection of the law. It then became a “custom” in law to attribute new births with a surname. The legal realm recognizes this last name as being over and above, superior to your first name/God-given name, for it cannot govern what is Natural [the first name considered Natural; of nature; distinguishing a living man created by an Act of God, His gift of life]— it can only govern what it creates [government’s sanction surnames indicating a legal entity for business/civil life; a per-son, a hu-man, a legal participant] and man’s law can only create artifice. The surname was, and still is, required for civil purposes and in this sense was always sanctioned by the sovereign. In some instances those who did not want to subject themselves to the system, without surname insinuation attaching him to a secular nation, had no protection of the law, could not fully participate in commerce, and were at risk of being persecuted or becoming enslaved. But those who lived in concordance with Yehovah with the knowledge exceeding that of the scribes [satanic writers of man’s law] were able to shield themselves from it’s false assumptions, as Jesus has shown us by walking on water which can be metaphoric for the sea of commerce, revealing how one can prevent himself from drowning in secular debt obligations; not just in respect of money but also the obligation of knowing and following all public laws and codes of his secular nation.

The fixing of personal names, and, in particular, permanent patronyms [surnames], as legal identities seems, everywhere, to have been, broadly-speaking, A STATE PROJECT [secular government, of men]. As an early and imperfect legal identification, the permanent patronym was linked to such vital administrative functions as tithe and tax collection, property registers, conscription lists, and census rolls.

The rise of the permanent patronym is inextricably associated with those aspects of state-making in which it was desirable to be able to distinguish individual (male) subjects: tax collection (including tithes), conscription, land revenue, court judgements, witness records, and police work.” The Production of Legal Identities Proper to States: The Case of the Permanent Family Surname, Yale University

Custom gives one ‘his father’s family name [surname], and such prxnomina [given name, Christian name] as his parents choose to put before it, but this is only general rule, from which individual may, depart, if he choose. In re‘” — Cohen, 142 Misc. 852, 255 N.Y.S. 616, 617., Black’s Law 4th

CUSTOM. A usage or practice of the people, which, by common adoption and acquiescence, and by long and unvarying habit, has become compulsory, and has acquired the force of a law with respect to the place or subject-matter to which it relates.” — Black’s Law 4th

tradition (n)
6. A CUSTOM handed down from one age or generation to another and having acquired almost the force of law.“— 1889 Century Dictionary

Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after THE TRADITION OF MEN, AFTER THE RUDIMENTS OF THE WORLD, and not after Christ.”— Col 2:8

We name a thing andbang!it leaps into existence. Each name a perfect equation with its roots. A perfect congruence with its reality. (Yolland and Owen)
But remember that words are signals, counters. They are not immortal. And it can happen to use— an image you’ll understand — it can happen that a civilization can be imprisoned in a linguistic contour which no longer matches the landscape of… fact. (Hugh)
I’ll decode you yet. (Yolland)” Brian Friel, Translations (London: Faber and Faber, 1981)

Today the only real reason people have a surname is for the insinuation of themselves into man’s law for civil purposes, i.e. commerce, judicial proceedings [a stage play], legal protections and privilege. It insinuates you into man’s legal existence. To have an additional name for rights and privileges of a nation, granted by the temporal gods [administrative agents of government] is a flattering title, for those without it do not have that luxury. It is a mark [a ‘trade-mark of commerce’] signifying you belong to a nation, and thus the Roman Pontiff, and are under it’s dominion. The last name causes spiritual distress on the man who volunteers into it, for that which is “last” is also considered a burden in law. It takes you out of God’s protection, out of Nature, and places you under the subjection of the artificial legal beast system, Satan’s world [man’s law, secular nations, the Jesuit Vatican Empire]. Many elites of this world don’t identify with surnames, they are private, but they also will act in a public status [with the required surname], sometimes through living trusts, for civil purposes. World leaders are chosen directly and indirectly [by the Jesuit Vatican Empire] to administrate the common people through acting in agency to specific corporation soles which are the highest status of persons in their nation.

personal name. An individual’s name or names given at birth, as distinguished from a family name. – Also termed given name; (in the Western tradition) first name; (in the Christian tradition) Christian name. Cf. surname.” — Black’s Law 8th

Christian-name:
The name given at the font [fountain/baptism], distinct from the Gentilitious name, or surname.” — 1755 Samuel Johnson English Dictionary 1st Edition

“The name given at christening; the personal name, as distinguished from the family name or surname…
…1727 Pope Th. on Var. Subj., When a man is made a spiritual peer he loses his sir-name; when a temporal, his christian-name. The Oxford English Dictionary 1933

last, n. Hist. 1. A burden.”— Black’s Law 9th

surname:
“<L. super, over, + nomen, name..] An additional name, frequently descriptive..; specifically, a name or appellation added to the baptismal or Christian name, and becoming a family name.” — 1889 Century Dictionary

“The name of one’s family, or an epithet added to one’s christian name, to denominate the person of such a family.” — 1757 Buchanan, New English Dictionary

A name over and above the baptismal or Christian name; the family name of and individual; an appellation added to the original name.” — 1896 Charels Annadale, English Dictionary

“The name of the family; the name which one has over and above the Christian name.” — 1755 Samuel Johnson English Dictionary 1st Edition

Additional name of descriptive or allusive kind attached to a person & sometimes becoming hereditary: the name common to all members of a family.” — 1919 The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English

“1. A name which is added to the christian name, and which, in modern
times, have become family names. 2. They are called surnames, because originally they were written over the name in judicial writings and contracts. They were and are still used for the purpose of distinguishing persons of the same name. They were taken from something attached to the persons assuming them, as John Carpenter, Joseph Black, Samuel Little, &c. See Name.” — 1856 Bouvier’s Law Dictionary

insinuation— 1. The act of insinuating; a creeping or winding in; a tortuous or stealthy passage, as into crevices, or (figuratively) into favor or affection.” — 1889 Century Dictionary

INSINUARE [in sin u are]— insinuare (in-sin-yoo-air-ee), vb.[Latin] Roman & civil law. To register; to deposit (an instrument [i.e. a birth certificate]) with a public registry.” — Blacks Law 8th

REGISTERrights which a king has by virtue of his prerogative.” — https://thelawdictionary.org/register/

debt:
2) obligation to deliver particular goods or perform certain acts according to an agreement, such as returning a favor.” — https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/debt

“1. That which is due from one person to another, whether money, goods, or services, and whether payable at present or at a future time; that which one person is bound to pay to or perform for another; what one is obliged to do or to suffer; a due; a duty; an obligation.

2. The state of being under obligation to make payment, as of money or services, to another; figuratively, the state of being under obligation in general.

3. An offense requiring reparation or expiation; default of duty: a trespass; a sin.” — 1889 Century Dictionary

“… It is reasonably clear that what we are witnessing, in the cataso exercise, are the first stages of an administrative crystallization of personal surnames. And the geography of this crystallization traced, almost perfectly, the administrative presence of the Florentine state… The small, tightly-knit vernacular world had no need for a ‘proper name’: such names were, for all practical purposes, official names confined to administrative life… As the case of Florence illustrates, the naming project, like the standardization of measurements and cadastral surveys, was very much a purposeful state mission.

… However, the surname system that emerged involved the use of hereditary and fixed last names. This fact is crucial to understanding the importance of patronyms with respect to the state. Indeed, the development of patronyms helped enforce private property rights, advance primogeniture regimes, and secure the ability of the state to make its subjects legible to its gaze.
The use of last names did not become common until well after the Norman Conquest. Social norms developed by the twelfth century dictated that it was a disgrace for a proper gentleman not to have a last name. The use of patronyms then spread, albeit unevenly, with the implementation of the poll tax under Richard II and the legal requirement of baptismal registration by Henry VIII.
… A closer analysis of the process of surname diffusion also reveals the link between the English naming system and the securing of private property rights. In a bargain that replicates itself in many other nations, the aristocracy gained security for their property rights by adopting heritable patronyms. Their new legal identity was a political resource in their claim to property in land and office. By the middle of the thirteenth century, a large proportion of large and medium landowners in England possessed hereditary last names.

Notice, also, that the normal, modem, institutional setting for birth and, hence, for the birth certificate forms, is the maternity ward of a hospital, where state-like bureaucratic routines for the collection of vital statistics prevail. When, by contrast, most children are born at home, with or without professional care, the official registration of births is that much more complex. Modern, formal institutions are handmaidens to the creation and hegemony of official patronyms. The hegemony of state-structured institutions such as schools, social security, military service, taxpaying, property registration and transfer provide the “traffic patterns” that ensure the dominance of state-identification practices. It is in most citizens’ interest to be duly recorded whenever state institutions have the power to provide a benefit or to diminish or cancel a penalty. Official identities, then, constitute an iron cage enclosing a great deal of social life in the contemporary modern state. The Production of Legal Identities Proper to States: The Case of the Permanent Family Surname, Yale University

“… The upper classes in nearly every case took their names from their territorial descriptions. Those outside the landholding classes had no need for surnames till a later date. They were never mentioned in a legal deed, and their Christian names, and perhaps nicknames, answered all distinctive purposes amoungst the few friends and neighbors who comprised the small circle of their acquaintance. They lived and died and were forgotten. A moment’s thought will show that this was so. Even at the present day there are hundreds of the lower classes who are only known by a Christian name and a nickname, and who find that the only occasion on which they [common persons] have the slightest use or opportunity of using a surname are their registration of birth, occasional for the purpose of marriage, at their appearances in the police-courts, and for the inquest at their death…” — 1889, The Genealogical Magazine, Vol. 2, A Treatise On The law Concerning Names And Changing Of Names

“This proprietorship is not so well known or understood as it ought to be; and the honourable member for Sheffield fell into a prevalent, but erroneous opinion on the subject, when he stated from his place in Parliament, that “any man has a right to take any name he pleases, upon any occasion he pleases, and for any reason he pleases.” This is not the case; and from time immemorial the Crown has been called upon either to sanction or veto the assumption of surnames. This right the Crown still possesses.

In America even, with all its lawless license, the America, countenance of the law was necessary to make the assumption of a name legal for social and commercial purposes [this legal name, or full name, must contain a surname, and it is officially written in all caps]. On this American question the Spectator says :—” In America the change requires an Act of the State Legislature ; and, to save trouble, all applications are lumped together in one schedule [and] passed as the Houses rise. The result is a little comic, as the practice is extended to Christian names[first name, given name], and Sukeys become Sophonisbas, and Sallys Armintas, with a sudden and frequency a little amusing to the Englishmen.”— The Spector, June 21, 1862, Surnames & Sirenames. The Origin And History Of Certain Family & Historical names

“Name changes, both of a voluntary and involuntary nature, create problems for the genealogist. Most East and Central European Jews used patronymics (e.g., Moshe ben Amram). Surnames were rare, unless the family was in commerce, and traveling between cities. Around 1800, the governments in Central Europe began to demand surnames for the Jews. By 1844, Russia and Poland mandated that surnames be registered. However, even these names underwent a metamorphosis when they passed through the immigration gates of America. Hardly able to understand the heavily accented pronunciation of names, immigration officials wrote down phonetic sounds as they heard them. They would anglicize, change, or shorten names, as the mood struck them.” —Encyclopaedia Judaica 2nd edition

“By a decree of July 20, 1808, the public authorities aimed to force Jews born before 1792 to declare their civil identity in order that they should not escape the obligations (notably military obligations) that citizenship now entailed. For this reason, the decree not only prescribed the adoption of a fixed forename and surname by those who had not previously had these, but also required all Jews to declare their civil status to the mayor of their commune, so that he could inscribe them in a special register.” — Documenting Individual Identity: The Development Of State Practices In The Modern World

People were influenced to choose surnames by the introduction of a poll tax [head tax] in 1379 where everyone aged 16 and over had their name recorded. And in 1413 the Statute of Additions required all legal documents not just to give a person’s name but also occupation and place of abode.” — A Short History of UK Personal Names

“The law of surnames may be concisely stated: there is none at all. But nevertheless, though there is no positive law on the subject, it may not be uninteresting to inquire into the usages [of surnames] which have arisen during the course of time, and which stand in the place of legal enactment. The use of surnames is an institution which has grown up so gradually, and has fulfilled its purpose so unobtrusively and well, that it has entirely escaped the attention of the legislature. There is one positive enactment only concerning the assumption of surnames, and it refers to a very limited district…

Lax as the practice with regard to armorial bearings is, and deplorable as it must appear to any true herald, it is undoubtedly a fact that the right to an ancestral coat of arms is strictly limited to the descendants of the first grantee… But the halcyon days of true heraldry have departed, it is to be feared, for ever; though, while protection is afforded by law to mere trade-marks of commerce [surnames], it seems an anomaly that the trade-marks, so to speak, of ancestry should go unprotected.” — The Law of Surnames. The Gentleman’s Magazine 243, October 1878

One of the predisposing factors to the formation of English surnames was the official survey made by William in 1086, which was afterwards compiled in a book called “The Domesday Book.” Men found themselves in this survey obliged to give some distinguishing name other than their personal name, and thus began the custom of men having a “to-name,” as it was sometimes quaintly called, meaning “added-to.”
Surnames have been made the subject of legal enactment for
centuries.

As population increased and intercourse [legal intercourse] became general, it became necessary to employ some further name by which one man might be known from another, and in process of time the use of surnames became universal, the only exceptions in England being the members of the royal family, who sign by their baptismal names only.

… But after the negro or any one else in this country [America]
has once assumed his surname or it has been thrust upon him by
custom, he must retain it for all civil purposes
unless he secures
legislative enactment or judicial decree to change it.
… All of the landed estates of a nation, all of the civic procedure, as well as all of the social observances, are bound up in the name-customs of the country.” — Surname Book and Racial History 1918

“The world in which we live in comprises several orders, among them the social, the political, the ecclesiastical, the military and the economic. The last name is referred to in everyday usage as the business world. Business administration is considered exclusively with the economic order, therefor at the outset it is necessary to have some general idea of what the business world is and how it operates.

Just as the social order is composed of all the individual human beings in the world the economic order is made up of all the individual business units in the business world. Each unit is regarded as a separate economic entity and the sum of all the economic entitles at one moment constitutes the business universe or economic order. Each economic unit is regarded as separate and distinct from all others. The true significance and meaning of economic entities may best be grasped by an analogy with social entities or human beings, who make up the social order.

Hence, every economic entity or business unit must receive at it’s inception a birth certificate, so to speak, pronouncing its birth as a legal entity, in order to be recognized by the law as in esse (in existence). From the date of its inception, the business unit will be able to avail itself of the law to protect its rights, and will be amenable to the law to perform its duties and uphold its responsibilities to other economic legal entities.” — Management And The Law by Samuel Fox, 1966 pg. 13-14

To spiritually legitimize having a surname some Christians will point to parts of The Bible, like how Jesus “surnamed” Simon Peter, but that notion is incorrect. Misconceptions of the Bible can be attributed to misinterpreting it’s allegorical rhetoric and misleading transliterations. In the ancient languages people spoke and authors wrote in metaphor and allegories to aid in understanding. The original writers of The Bible commonly used allegories as a rhetorical device, but as time passed languages became used more literally and the later versions of these books have been intentionally vernacularize by the Vatican, Jesuits, Jesuit coadjutors, Freemasons, and King James— an effeminate homosexual freemason who did not favor how the Geneva bible negatively portrayed rulers of nations. So it is up to The Bible reader to do his due diligence, through studying the allegorical usage of the writers and looking into the lexicons and concordances to distinguish intentional false transliterations in order to decipher it’s true intent.

In The Bible the hebrew word “כָּנָה kânâh” is used 4 times in the KJV as 2 translated usages, “surname” and “flattering titles.” This fact alone indicates a relation to surnames being flattering titles. Strong’s Definitions describes the word, “to address by an additional name; hence, to eulogize:—give flattering titles, surname (himself).”  Gesenius’ Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon defines the term as, “(1) to address kindly, to call (any one) kindly. (2) to flatter.”, whereas Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon defines it as, “betitle, title, given an epithet or cognomen.”

In Isaiah 44:5 “כָּנָה kânâh” represents an honorable call and is used in a good way, but translated into the bad term “surname.” This was done to make the commoners think that it is acceptable to have a surname under a nation and still adhere to God.

Verses 32:21-22 of the Book of Job uses the term in a bad sense, a “flattering title”, as exalting one in his own estimation; artificially legitimizing what one claims to be in which he is not in Reality. Claiming to be a citizen of a nation is not who you are in the Reality of Nature, for a citizen [legal status] is an artificial creation of law, and what is Real cannot be of artifice.

In Mark 3:16 Jesus gave Simon a Christian name [first name], as opposed to a surname, Peter. The Greek words applied are “ἐπιτίθημι”, which means ‘to put or lay upon’, and “ὄνομα” [omitted from the KJV] which means ‘proper name’ or ‘name.’ Depending on the usage of the term “proper name” it can mean the given name or surname. In Roman law the first/given name was the proper name. Some might claim that ‘Peter’ is Simon’s last name in the sense that it is placed last and considered over and above his original name, but it is meant to be a given name and not a surname that is sanctioned by a temporal sovereign for “legal enactment.” Jesus cannot give a man a surname, for surnames were always “an aspect of state-making” and have always been sanctioned by the sovereign entity of a nation for “civil purposes.” This is another attempt by the writers of the later versions, i.e. KJV, to make the use of secular surnames acceptable under God. In the Geneva Bible, Mark 3:16 is transliterated as “And the first was Simon, and hee named, Peter,..” as opposed to the KJV, “And Simon he surnamed Peter;…” Again, this KJV transliteration was to aid in manipulating people into accepting a surname under a gentile nation.

“The impact of the annotations and commentary in the Geneva Bible cannot be underestimated. The Calvinist notes of the Geneva Bible infuriated King James I at Hampton Court in 1604, prompting him to authorize a group of Puritan scholars to produce a version of the Bible without annotation for him; ironically, the excellent Authorized Version might never have been written were it not for King James’s antipathy toward the Geneva Bible.

The marginal notes of the Geneva Bible present a systematic Biblical worldview centered on the Sovereignty of God over all of His creation including churches and kings. This unique Biblical emphasis, though fraught with dangers beyond spiritual debates (i.e., political and social pressure), was one of John Calvin’s great contributions to the English Reformers. For example, the marginal note in the Geneva Bible for Exodus 1:19 indicated that the Hebrew midwives were correct to disobey the Egyptian rulers. King James called such interpretations “seditious.” The tyrant knew that if the people could hold him accountable to God’s Word, his days as a king ruling by “Divine Right” were numbered, but Calvin and the Reformers defended the clear meaning of Scripture against whims of king or popes…” — 2006 print, 1599 Geneva Bible, The History And Impact Of The Geneva Bible

On the west wall of the lodge hall used by Lodge Scoon and Perth No. 3 in Perth, Scotland can be found a mural depicting James VI kneeling at their altar at his initiation. The oldest existing record of the Lodge, called “The Mutual Agreement” of 24 December, 1658, records that James was “entered freemason and Fellowcraft of the Lodge of Scoon” on 15 April, 1601.” — http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/biography/james_vi/james_vi.html

The first edition of the King James Bible, which was edited by Francis Bacon [aka Sir Tobie Matthew, S.J] and prepared under Masonic supervision, bears more Mason’s marks than the Cathedral of Strasburg.” — Manly P. Hall, from a lecture Rosicrucian and Masonic Origins 1929

כָּנָה kânâh, kaw-naw’; a primitive root; to address by an additional name; hence, to eulogize:—give flattering titles, surname (himself).” — Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible

“(1) to address kindly, to call (any one) kindly Isa 44:5, Isa 45:4… (2) to flatter. Job 32:21, 22.” — Gesenius’ Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon

[כָּנָה] verb, Pi`el, betitle, title, give an epithet or cognomen.
Pi`el Imperfect1singular suffix בִשְׁמֶ֑ךָ אֲכַנְּךָוָאֶקְרָא לְךָ Isaiah 45:4 I have called thee by thy name, giving thee a title (of honour; compare for construction Dr§ 163); 3 masculine singular וּבְשֵׁם יִשְׂרָאֵל יְכַנֶּה Isaiah 44:5, and with the name Israel he titles (himself), is hardly possibly; absolute he betitles, or makes use of a title, is unlikely; read probably
כָּנָה, verb, Pu’al, see below, in bad sense = give a flattering title: וְאֶלאָֿדָם לֹא אֲכַנֶּה Job 32:21 ‘and unto man I do not give flattering titles’ (“” אַללֿנָא אֶשָּׂא פְנֵי אִישׁ); absolute, Job 32:22. ” — Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon, Unabridged

ἐπιτίθημι,
a. to put or lay upon:… Mark 3:16

ὄνομα, ὀνόματος… cf. Latin nomen (English name), with the prefixed omicron ὀ (but see Curtius, § 446)), the Sept. for שֵׁם (from Homer down), the name by which a person or a thing is called, and distinguished from others;
1. universally: of proper names [for Simon, not a surname], Mark 3:16″ — Thayer’s Greek Lexicon

The first name (prcenomen) was the proper name of the individual; the second (nomen) indicated the gees or tribe to which he belonged; while the third (cognomen) denoted his family or house. The agnomen was added on account of some particular event, as a further distinction.” — Black’s 4th

Simply looking at the terms attributed to the word ‘surname’ is telling, especially when considering that it is in fact a flattering title. The latin term for surname is ‘cognomen’. In the vernacular the first prefix is said to be of ‘com’ which means ‘with, together’, but the actual spelling of it is ‘cog’ which refers to trickery, flattery, falsehood, cheat, deception, artifice [it is logical to conclude that both prefixes ‘com’ and ‘cog’ are simultaneously in use here]. ‘Nomen’, rooted from ‘no-men’, means ‘name’ or sometimes a name of a tribe/family group. Evidently the term ‘nickname’ is referred as to surname. And ‘nick’ signifies ‘a notch [a mark]’, ‘the devil’ and to ‘cheat’.

cog (kog), v.; pret. and pp. cogged, ppr. cogging. [Not found in ME.; perhaps from W. coegio, make void, trick, pretend, <coeg, empty, vain, sausy, silly, foolish: To empty into a wooden vessel..]
I. trans. 1. To flatter; wheedle; seduce or win by adulation or artifice.
2. To obtrude or thrust by falsehood or deception; foist; palm: usually with in or on.
3. To adapt ( a die) by cheating, by loading it, as to direct its fall: as, to play with cogged dice.
II. intrans. 1. To wheedle; flatter; dissimulate. To cheat, especially by means of loaded dice.” — Century Dictionary 1889

COGverb transitive
1. To flatter; to wheedle; to seduce or draw from, by adulation or artifice.
2. To obtrude or thrust in, by falsehood or deception; as, to cog in a word to serve a purpose. To cog a die, to secure it so as to direct its fall; to falsify; to cheat in playing dice.
COGverb intransitive
1. To deceive; to cheat; to lie.
2. To wheedle.” — Webster’s Dictionary 1828

nomen (noh-men or -m,m), n. [Latin] l. Roman law. A personal name. A Roman citizen generally had three names: a praenomen (“first name”), a nomen (“the name of the family group”), and cognomen (“a surname”). 2. Hist. A person’s first name. 3. More broadly, any name.” — Black’s Law 9th

cognomen (n.),
1754, “a distinguishing name;” 1809, “a surname;” from Latin, from assimilated form of com “with, together” (see com-) + (g)nomen “name” (from PIE root *no-men- “name”). The last of the three names by which a Roman citizen was known (Caius Julius Csar, Marcus Tullius Cicero).” — etymonline.com

agnomen (ag-noh-m<ln). [Latin]l. An additional name or title; a nickname. 2. Roman law. An additional name, given in recognition of some achievement or to reflect adoption by a different gens.” – Black’s Law 7th

surname. 1. The name of the family, the name which one has over and above the Christian name; an appellation added to the original name.” — 1797 Sheridian, A Complete Dictionary of the English Language

NICKNAMEnoun [G. To banter. Signifies to surname, to call by a name of reproach.] A name given in contempt, derision or reproach; an opprobrious appellation.” – Webster’s 1828

nick:
1. A hollow cut or slight depression made in the surface of anything; a notch [a mark].
9. The devil: usually with the addition of Old. [Old St. Nick; Santa Clause]
12. To delude or deceive; cozen; cheat, as at dice.
14. To fit; unite or combine; be adapted for combining: said, in stock-breeding, of the crossing of one strain of blood with another.” – 1889 Century Dictionary

The surname (cognomen) is an additional name (agnomen) signifying adoption by a nation (gens); the taking from one parent, God, to another, Satan. Regardless of your religion, if you are of a nation you are a gentile which the surname also signifies. And yes, even the majority of jews are gentiles.

GENS. – Race; nation; great family. In Roman law, a subdivision of the people next to the euria, and constituting a number of familiae.”

GENTILES. – In the Roman law, the members of a gens or common tribe, and to whom the property of a deceased member anciently belonged, failing any sui haeredes or agnati.” — Rapalje, A Dictionary_ of American and English Law Vol 1. 1888

GEN’TILE,
noun
[Latin gentilis; from Latin gens, nation, race; applied to pagans.]
In the scriptures, a pagan; a worshiper of false gods; any person not a Jew or a christian; a heathen. The Hebrews included in the term goyim or nations, all the tribes of men who had not received the true faith, and were not circumcised. The christians translated goyim by the Latin gentes, and imitated the Jews in giving the name gentiles to all nations who were not Jews nor christians. In civil affairs, the denomination was given to all nations who were not Romans.
adjective
Pertaining to pagans or heathens.” — Webster’s Dictionary 1828

gentile,
adjective:
3. In gram., expressing nationality, local extraction, or place of abode; describing or designating a person as belonging to a certain race, country, district, town, or locality by birth or otherwise: as, a gentile noun (as Greek, Arab, Englishman, etc.); a gentile adjective (as Florentine, Spanish, etc.).
noun:
4. In gram. a noun or adjective derived from the name of a country or locality, and designating its natives or people: as the words Italian, American, Athenian, are gentiles.” — 1889 Century Dictionary

gentile,
Pagan and heathen are primarily the same in meaning; but pagan is sometimes distinctively applied to those nations that, although worshiping false gods, are more cultivated, as the Greeks and Romans, and heathen to uncivilized idolaters, as the tribes of Africa. A Mohammedan is not counted a pagan, much less a heathen.” — 1889 Century Dictionary

PA’GANnoun [Latin paganus, a peasant or countryman, from pagus, a village.] A heathen; a Gentile; an idolater; one who worships false gods. This word was originally applied to the inhabitants of the country, who on the first propagation of the christian religion adhered to the worship of false gods, or refused to receive christianity, after it had been received by the inhabitants of the cities. In like manner, heathen signifies an inhabitant of the heath or woods, and caffer, in Arabic, signifies the inhabitant of a hut or cottage, and one that does not receive the religion of Mohammed. pagan is used to distinguish one from a Christian and a Mohammedan.” — Webster’s 1828 Dictionary

People,
1. The body of persons who compose a community, town, city or nation.
2. The vulgar; the mass of illiterate persons.
3. A collection or community of animals.
4. The Gentiles.” — Webster’s 1828 Dictionary

גּוֹי gôwy, go’-ee; rarely (shortened) גֹּי gôy; apparently from the same root as H1465 (in the sense of massing); a foreign nation; hence, a Gentile; also (figuratively) a troop of animals, or a flight of locusts:—Gentile, heathen, nation, people.” — Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible

Goynation, people
NASB Translation
every nation (2), Gentiles (1), Goiim (1), Harosheth-hagoyim* (3), herds (1), nation (120), nations (425), people (4).” — NAS Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible 

The legal necessity of the surname is a product of the Beast System that is of Rome. Nations are shaped significantly, directly and indirectly, by the concepts of the pagan Roman law. These nations are gentile nations. Your person, in it’s required surname, is under the dominion of the Pope, and his Holy Roman Vatican Empire, who claims the temporal and spiritual sovereignty of all nations and “every human creature“. The antichrists are the Pope, the Jesuits, and all of the false teachers of Truth. Within the flattering titles of Rome, the Vatican, and the Pope contain the numerical value of 666. Even without applying gematria, one of the Pope’s titles is the Vicar of Christ [Vicarius Filii Dei – Vicar of The Son of God]. The term ‘vicar/vicarious [Vicarius]’ means “in place of” which is also a definition of the term ‘anti’. The Pope and the Jesuits are antichrists, for their corporate existence, teachings, and rhetoric are opposed to Christ, and evidently the papacy [the office of the Pope which includes all men providing agency to it] is The Antichrist as foretold in Revelations. All nations are matrixes of Rome, and these concepts are the foundation of the legal world which denotes the Beast System. The purpose of nations, including America, is to administrate and gain from human sin [Order Out Of Chaos], for breaking several of God’s commandments is required for participation. A spiritual man would never leave Nature and voluntarily alienate his adherence to God for the luxuries of civil society.

“All roads lead to Rome”

We are not isolated and we are not Christians on an individual basis, each one on his or her own, no, our Christian identity is to belong! We are Christians because we belong to the Church. It is like a last name: if the first name is “I am Christian”, the last name is “I belong to the Church”. —POPE FRANCIS, GENERAL AUDIENCE, St. Peter’s Square Wednesday, 25 June 2014

ANTICHRIST – Against Christ, or an opposition Christ, a rival Christ. The word is used only by the apostle John. Referring to False teachers, he says (1 John 2:18, 22; 4:3; 2 John 1:7), “Even now are there many antichrists.” (1.) This name has been applied to the “little horn” of the “king of fierce countenance” (Dan. 7:24, 25; 8:23-25). (2.) It has been applied also to the “false Christs” spoken of by our Lord (Matt. 24:5, 23, 24). (3.) To the “man of sin” described by Paul (2 Thess. 2:3, 4, 8-10). (4.) And to the “Beast of The Sea” (Rev. 13:1; 17:1-18). — Easton’s 1897 Bible Dictionary

ἀντίχριστος (antichrist),
“… The name ὁ ἀντίχριστος was formed perhaps by John, the only writer in the N. T. who uses it, [five times]; he employs it of the corrupt power and influence hostile to Christian interests, especially that which is at work in false teachers who have come from the bosom of the church and are engaged in disseminating error: 1 John 2:18 (where the meaning is, ‘what ye have heard concerning Antichrist, as about to make his appearance just before the return of Christ, is now fulfilled in the many false teachers, most worthy to be called antichrists,’ [on the omission of the article cf. Buttmann, 89 (78)]); 1 John 4:3; and of the false teachers themselves, 1 John 2:22″ — THAYER’S GREEK LEXICON, G500

Vicar of (Jesus) Christ [Latin, Vicarius Filii Dei],
a title assumed by the Pope with reference to his claim to stand in the place of Jesus Christ and possesses his authority in the church. — 1889 Century Dictionary

VICA’RIOUSadjective [Latin vicarius.]
2. Acting for another; filling the place of another; as a vicarious agent or officer.
3. Substituted in the place of another; as a vicarious sacrifice. The doctrine of vicarious punishment has occasioned much controversy. — 1828 Webster’s Dictionary

AN’TInoun [Gr. See Ante.]
A preposition signifying against, opposite, contrary, or in place of; used in many English words. — 1828 Webster’s Dictionary

“What the Seal of the United States of America represents, to anyone who takes it seriously, is a Ministry of Sin. A speech by Jesuit political scientist Michael Novak, published in the January 28, 1989 issue of America, the weekly magazine of American Jesuits, sums it up eloquently enough:
‘The framers wanted to build a “novus ordo” that would secure “liberty and justice for all”…. The underlying principle of this new order is the fact of human sin. To build a republic designed for sinners, then, is the indispensable task…. There is no use building a social system for saints. There are too few of them. And those there are are impossible to live with!… Any effective social system must therefore be designed for the only moral majority there is: sinners.’

The Latin historians Ovid , Pliny, and Aurelius Victor all tell us that the prehistoric name for Rome was Saturnia, “city of Saturn.” Saturnia’s original settlers came from the east, from Babylon. In the Babylonian (or Chaldean) language, according to Alexander Hislop, Saturnia was pronounced “Satr ” but spelled with only four characters, Stur. Now, Chaldean, like Hebrew, Greek, and to a limited extent Latin, had no separate numbering system. Their numbers were represented by certain characters of their alphabet. The cabalah derives its power from mathematical energies conveyed from these languages. Hislop reported a phenomenon that he said “every Chaldee scholar knows, ” which is that the letters of Stur, Rome’s earliest name, total 666:
S = 60; T = 400; U = 6; R = 200 := 666


Hislop further reported that Roman numerals consist of only six letters, D (500), C (100), L (50), X (10), V (5), and I (1 ) – we ignore the letter M, signifying 1,000, because it’s a latecomer, having evolved as shorthand for two D’s. When we total these six letters, we discover a startling link with the Beast of Revelation embedded in the very alphanumeric communication system of the Romans:
D= 500; C = 100; L = 50; X = 10; V = 5; I = 1 := 666” — Rulers of Evil: Useful Knowledge About Governing Bodies

Fifty Years in The Church of Rome, 1886, p. 372, 679, 681
Facing The Twentieth Century: Our Country, Its Power And Peril, 1899, p. 188-189
Popery. An Enemy to Civil and Religious Liberty; and Dangerous to Our Republic, 1836, p. 191